Simultaneity in Perception of Knocking

被引:2
|
作者
Pressman, Assaf [1 ,2 ]
Karniel, Amir [1 ]
Mussa-Ivaldi, Ferdinando A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Biomed Engn, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Rehabil Inst Chicago, Sensory Motor Performance Program, Chicago, IL 60611 USA
来源
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SYSTEMS MAN AND CYBERNETICS PART A-SYSTEMS AND HUMANS | 2012年 / 42卷 / 04期
关键词
Active guidance; haptic; motor learning; motor system; perception; PSYCHOMETRIC FUNCTION; TIME; REPRESENTATION; RECALIBRATION; TOUCH;
D O I
10.1109/TSMCA.2012.2183354
中图分类号
TP3 [计算技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
"Knock, knock-who's there?" Here, we do not address this question but rather the underlying mechanism behind the perception of knocking impacts. When one knocks on a surface, her hand makes a forward-backward motion and, at the point of reversal, the knuckles collide with the rigid surface. How does one perceive the unity, or simultaneity, of the sensory events associated with this impact? Does this binding derive from a temporal estimate of simultaneity, or does the brain use some other mechanism? In this paper, we ask whether the tap and the reversal of the hand are perceived as happening together, since both took place at the same time or at a particular state of motion. The aim of this research is to find out whether a tactile event and the flow of proprioceptive information regarding the state of the arm are matched within the central nervous system according to time or state. We tested this experimentally with subjects who actively moved one arm, as well as subjects who were servoed by a robotic device. Our results suggest that time is the mechanism used for judging the unity of the modalities for both active and passive movements. Taken together, these results provide a useful cue for neuroscientists as to the structure and function of the perceptual and motor systems and essential engineering knowledge for the development of effective and realistic augmented reality systems with haptics for the telerobotics, telesurgery, and telepresence applications of the future.
引用
收藏
页码:920 / 930
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Bayesian Calibration of Simultaneity in Audiovisual Temporal Order Judgments
    Yamamoto, Shinya
    Miyazaki, Makoto
    Iwano, Takayuki
    Kitazawa, Shigeru
    PLOS ONE, 2012, 7 (07):
  • [22] Differential vertical visual latency as determined with a simultaneity paradigm
    Patel, Shephali
    Schwartz, Steven H.
    Swanson, William H.
    VISION RESEARCH, 2010, 50 (05) : 534 - 540
  • [23] Individual Alpha Frequency Predicts Perceived Visuotactile Simultaneity
    Migliorati, Daniele
    Zappasodi, Filippo
    Perrucci, Mauro Gianni
    Donno, Brunella
    Northoff, Georg
    Romei, Vincenzo
    Costantini, Marcello
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2020, 32 (01) : 1 - 11
  • [24] Simultaneity and temporal order perception: Different sides of the same coin? Evidence from a visual prior-entry study
    Weiss, Katharina
    Scharlau, Ingrid
    QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 64 (02) : 394 - 416
  • [25] Comparing Bayesian models for simultaneity judgement with different causal assumptions
    Sato, Yoshiyuki
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2021, 102
  • [26] Limitations on simultaneity in sign language
    Napoli, Donna Jo
    Sutton-Spence, Rachel
    LANGUAGE, 2010, 86 (03) : 647 - 662
  • [27] Is the relativity of simultaneity a temporal illusion?
    Brogaard, Berit
    Marlow, Kristian
    ANALYSIS, 2013, 73 (04) : 635 - 642
  • [28] Long-term music training modulates the recalibration of audiovisual simultaneity
    Jicol, Crescent
    Proulx, Michael J.
    Pollick, Frank E.
    Petrini, Karin
    EXPERIMENTAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2018, 236 (07) : 1869 - 1880
  • [29] Dissociating the sequential dependency of subjective temporal order from subjective simultaneity
    Recio, Renan Schiavolin
    Cravo, Andre Mascioli
    de Camargo, Raphael Yokoingawa
    van Wassenhove, Virginie
    PLOS ONE, 2019, 14 (10):
  • [30] Apparent causality affects perceived simultaneity
    Kohlrausch, Armin
    van Eijk, Rob
    Juola, James F.
    Brandt, Inge
    van de Par, Steven
    ATTENTION PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 2013, 75 (07) : 1366 - 1373