Tissue concentrations of sulfamethazine and tetracycline hydrochloride of swine (Sus scrofa domestica) as it relates to withdrawal methods for international export

被引:7
作者
Mason, Sharon E. [1 ]
Wu, Huali [2 ]
Yeatts, Jim E. [3 ,4 ]
Baynes, Ronald E. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Campbell Univ, Dept Biol Sci, Buies Creek, NC 27506 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Med Ctr, Duke Clin Res Inst, Durham, NC USA
[3] Ctr Chem Toxicol Res & Pharmacokinet, Raleigh, NC USA
[4] N Carolina State Univ, Raleigh, NC 27695 USA
关键词
Swine; Tetracycline; Sulfa methazine; Pharmacokinetics; Population; Monte Carlo method; FDA tolerance limit method; Maximum residue limit; Withdrawal interval; Withdrawal time; PHARMACOKINETIC MODEL; WATER MEDICATION; PRODUCTION UNIT; EDIBLE TISSUES; TIMES; SULFADIMIDINE; PREDICTION; RESIDUES; FEED; PIGS;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.02.013
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
The use of water medications is a common practice in the US swine industry to treat and prevent infections in swine herds with minimal labor and without risk of needle breakage. There are concerns that FDA-approved withdrawal times (WDT) may be inadequate for several water medications when exporting pork products to countries where MRLs (maximum residue limits) are lower than US tolerance levels. In this study, withdrawal intervals (WDI) were estimated for pigs when dosed with tetracycline and sulfamethazine in water. The WDI were calculated using the FDA tolerance method (TLM) and a population-based pharmacokinetic method (PopPK). The estimated WDIs (14-16 days using TLM) were similar to the approved WDT of 15 days for sulfamethazine. However, the PopPK method extended WDIs for both sulfamethazine (19-20 days) and tetracycline (12 days) compared to the currently approved WDTs in the U.S. This study also identified potential differences in WDI between weanling and finisher pigs. In conclusion. the TLM may not always provide adequate WDT for foreign export markets especially when MRLs differ from tolerance levels approved for US markets. However, PopPK methods can provide conservative WDIs in situations with considerable variability in medication exposure such as with administration in water. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:590 / 596
页数:7
相关论文
共 21 条
  • [1] Veterinary drug usage and antimicrobial resistance in bacteria of animal origin
    Aarestrup, FM
    [J]. BASIC & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & TOXICOLOGY, 2005, 96 (04) : 271 - 281
  • [2] [Anonymous], APPR AN DRUG PROD GR
  • [3] Use Estimates of In-Feed Antimicrobials in Swine Production in the United States
    Apley, Michael D.
    Bush, Eric J.
    Morrison, Robert B.
    Singer, Randall S.
    Snelson, Harry
    [J]. FOODBORNE PATHOGENS AND DISEASE, 2012, 9 (03) : 272 - 279
  • [4] Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicine Authority (APVMA), MEAT LIV AUSTR RES
  • [5] Use of probabilistic modeling within a physiologically based pharmacokinetic model to predict sulfamethazine residue withdrawal times in edible tissues in swine
    Buur, Jennifer
    Baynes, Ronald
    Smith, Geof
    Riviere, Jim
    [J]. ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2006, 50 (07) : 2344 - 2351
  • [6] Development of a physiologic-based pharmacokinetic model for estimating sulfamethazine concentrations in swine and application to prediction of violative residues in edible tissues
    Buur, JL
    Baynes, RE
    Craigmill, AL
    Riviere, JE
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2005, 66 (10) : 1686 - 1693
  • [7] EMA, 2014, MAX RES LIM ASS REP
  • [8] FDA, 2006, GUID IND 3 GEN PRINC
  • [9] Friis, 1984, ACTA PHARMACOL TOX, V54, P321
  • [10] Tetracycline Residues in Porcine Stomach after Administration via Drinking Water on a Swine Farm
    Lindquist, Danielle
    Wu, Huali
    Mason, Sharon
    Yeatts, Jim
    Brooks, Jim
    Barlow, Beth
    Schill, Kaitlyn
    Baynes, Ronald
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD PROTECTION, 2014, 77 (01) : 122 - 126