Readability of Patient Education Materials From the Web Sites of Orthopedic Implant Manufacturers

被引:13
作者
Yi, Meghan M. [1 ]
Yi, Paul H. [2 ]
Hussein, Khalil I. [3 ]
Cross, Michael B. [4 ]
Della Valle, Craig J. [5 ]
机构
[1] Albany Med Coll, Albany, NY 12208 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Dept Radiol, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
[3] Greenwich Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Greenwich, CT USA
[4] Hosp Special Surg, Dept Orthoped Surg, 535 E 70th St, New York, NY 10021 USA
[5] Rush Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped Surg, 1611 West Harrison St,Suite 300, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
关键词
patient education; readability; internet; arthroplasty; orthopedic; patients; ONLINE INFORMATION; AMERICAN ACADEMY; HEALTH OUTCOMES; QUALITY; LITERACY; INTERNET; SURGEONS; BACK;
D O I
10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.003
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Prior studies indicate that orthopedic patient education materials are written at a level that is too high for the average patient. The purpose of this study was to assess the readability of online patient education materials provided by orthopedic implant manufacturers. Methods: All patient education articles available in 2013 from the web sites of the 5 largest orthopedic implant manufacturers were identified. Each article was evaluated with the Flesch-Kincaid (FK) readability test. The number of articles with readability <= the eighth-grade level (average reading ability of US adults) and the sixth-grade level (recommended level for patient education materials) was determined. Mean readability levels of each company's articles were compared using analysis of variance (significance set at P < .05). Results: A total of 581 articles were reviewed from the 5 largest implant manufacturers. The mean overall FK grade level was 10.9 (range, 3.8-16.1). Only 58 articles (10%) were written <= the eighth-grade level, and only 13 (2.2%) were <= the sixth-grade level. The mean FK grade level was significantly different among groups (Smith & Nephew = 12.0, Stryker = 11.6, Biomet = 11.3, DePuy = 10.6, Zimmer = 10.1; P < .0001). Conclusion: The majority of patient education materials from implant manufacturers are written at a level too high to be comprehended by the average patient. Future efforts should be made to improve the readability of orthopedic patient education materials. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3568 / 3572
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Evaluating the Readability, Quality, and Reliability of Online Patient Education Materials on Spinal Cord Stimulation [J].
Gunduz, Muhammet Enes ;
Matis, Georgios K. ;
Ozduran, Erkan ;
Hanci, Volkan .
TURKISH NEUROSURGERY, 2024, 34 (04) :588-599
[22]   Readability of Patient Education Materials From RadiologyInfo. org: Has There Been Progress Over the Past 5 Years? [J].
Bange, Matthew ;
Huh, Eric ;
Novi, Sherwin A. ;
Hui, Ferdinand K. ;
Yi, Paul H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2019, 213 (04) :875-879
[23]   Readability of Online Neuro-Oncology-Related Patient Education Materials from Tertiary-Care Academic Centers [J].
Ammanuel, Simon G. ;
Edwards, Caleb S. ;
Alhadi, Rasheed ;
Hervey-Jumper, Shawn L. .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 134 :E1108-E1114
[24]   The Use of Artificial Intelligence to Improve Readability of Otolaryngology Patient Education Materials [J].
Patel, Evan A. ;
Fleischer, Lindsay ;
Filip, Peter ;
Eggerstedt, Michael ;
Hutz, Michael ;
Michaelides, Elias ;
Batra, Pete S. ;
Tajudeen, Bobby A. .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2024, 171 (02) :603-608
[25]   Readability assessment of Spanish online patient education materials in gynecologic oncology [J].
Thomas, Dionna ;
Ratnaparkhi, Rubina .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY REPORTS, 2024, 56
[26]   Assessment of readability and quality of patient education materials specific to nocturnal enuresis [J].
Mohile, Juhi M. ;
Luzon, Joan B. ;
Agrawal, Gunjan ;
Malhotra, Neha R. ;
Kan, Kathleen M. .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC UROLOGY, 2023, 19 (05) :1-7
[27]   Readability of the Most Commonly Accessed Online Patient Education Materials Pertaining to Surgical Treatments of the Spine [J].
Phan, Amy ;
Jubril, Ayodeji ;
Menga, Emmanuel ;
Mesfin, Addisu .
WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2021, 152 :E583-E588
[28]   Readability of online patient education materials for velopharyngeal insufficiency [J].
Xie, Deborah X. ;
Wang, Ray Y. ;
Chinnadurai, Sivakumar .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, 2018, 104 :113-119
[29]   Readability and quality assessment of internet-based patient education materials related to laryngeal cancer [J].
Narwani, Vishal ;
Nalamada, Keerthana ;
Lee, Michael ;
Kothari, Prasad ;
Lakhani, Raj .
HEAD AND NECK-JOURNAL FOR THE SCIENCES AND SPECIALTIES OF THE HEAD AND NECK, 2016, 38 (04) :601-605
[30]   Readability of online Spanish patient education materials in dermatology [J].
Mazmudar, Rishabh S. ;
Sheth, Anjani ;
Tripathi, Raghav ;
Scott, Jeffrey F. .
ARCHIVES OF DERMATOLOGICAL RESEARCH, 2021, 313 (03) :201-204