Prevention of propofol-induced injection pain by sufentanil - A placebo-controlled comparison with remifentanil

被引:12
作者
Honarmand, Azim [1 ]
Safavi, Mohammadreza [1 ]
机构
[1] Isfahan Univ Med Sci, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, Esfahan, Iran
关键词
D O I
10.2165/00044011-200828010-00004
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and objective: Propofol produces anaesthesia with rapid recovery but also causes pain or discomfort on injection. The effect of remifentanil in prevention of propofol-induced injection pain has been demonstrated in earlier studies. However, sufentanil, an opioid analgesic, has not been evaluated as an agent for managing pain on injection of propofol. In this study we aimed to compare the efficacy of remifentanil and sufentanil for the prevention of propofol-induced pain. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical study was carried out from July 2006 to February 2007, and included patients who were candidates for elective surgery in a university hospital. From 92 American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-II adult patients, 80 were randomly assigned to four groups of 20 each. Patients received 2 mL of sufentanil 0.01 mg, 2 mL of remifentanil 0.01 mg, 2 mL of remifentanil 0.02 mg, or 2 mL of saline 60 seconds prior to administration of 5 mL of propofol 1%. Patients were asked prior to losing consciousness whether they felt any pain due to propofol injection, and their pain scores were evaluated on the four-point scale of Ambesh et al. Results: The incidence of pain was significantly lower in the remifentanil 0.02-mg group, remifentanil 0.01-mg group and sufentanil group compared with the saline group (40%, 70%, 75% and 100%, respectively, p < 0.05). Median pain intensity scores were significantly lower in the group receiving remifentanil 0.02 mg than in the sufentanil group (0 and I respectively, p < 0.05). The median intensity of propofol-induced pain was statistically similar between the groups receiving sufentanil or remifentanil 0.01 mg and the placebo group (1, 1 and 1, respectively, p > 0.05). Conclusion: Remifentanil 0.02 mg administered over 60 seconds before propofol administration is more effective than sufentanil 0.01 mg, remifentanil 0.01 mg or placebo administered 1 minute prior to propofol in reducing the incidence and intensity of injection pain.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 35
页数:9
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Agarwal A, 2004, CAN J ANAESTH, V51, P130, DOI 10.1007/BF03018771
[2]   Ondansetron pretreatment to alleviate pain on propofol injection: A randomized, controlled, double blinded study [J].
Ambesh, SP ;
Dubey, PK ;
Sinha, PK .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1999, 89 (01) :197-199
[3]  
Bachmann-Mennenga B, 2003, ARZNEIMITTEL-FORSCH, V53, P621
[4]   CONTRIBUTION OF CENTRAL NEUROPLASTICITY TO PATHOLOGICAL PAIN - REVIEW OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL-EVIDENCE [J].
CODERRE, TJ ;
KATZ, J ;
VACCARINO, AL ;
MELZACK, R .
PAIN, 1993, 52 (03) :259-285
[5]   Reducing pain during propofol injection: The role of the solvent [J].
Doenicke, AW ;
Roizen, MF ;
Rau, J ;
Kellermann, W ;
Babl, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 82 (03) :472-474
[6]   Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol in a new solvent [J].
Doenicke, AW ;
Roizen, MF ;
Rau, J ;
OConnor, M ;
Kugler, J ;
Klotz, U ;
Babl, J .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 85 (06) :1399-1403
[7]   PRETREATMENT WITH ALFENTANIL REDUCES PAIN CAUSED BY PROPOFOL [J].
FLETCHER, JE ;
SEAVELL, CR ;
BOWEN, DJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 72 (03) :342-344
[8]   RETRACTED: Flurbiprofen axetil preceded by venous occlusion in the prevention of pain on propofol injection in the hand: A prospective, randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, dose-finding study in Japanese adult surgical patients (Retracted Article) [J].
Fujii, Y ;
Shiga, Y .
CLINICAL THERAPEUTICS, 2005, 27 (05) :588-593
[9]  
Glass PSA, 1999, ANESTH ANALG, V89, pS7, DOI 10.1097/00000539-199910001-00003
[10]   REDUCTION OF PAIN ON INJECTION CAUSED BY PROPOFOL [J].
HELMERS, JHJH ;
KRAAIJENHAGEN, RJ ;
VANLEEUWEN, L ;
ZUURMOND, WWA .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (02) :267-268