Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction implemented by the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System over a minimum follow-up of 10 years

被引:12
作者
Chiang, Liang-Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lee, Cheng-Hung [1 ,4 ]
Tong, Kwok-Man [5 ]
Wang, Shun-Ping [1 ]
Lee, Kun-Tsan [1 ]
Tsai, Wen-Chen [6 ]
Chen, Chao-Ping [1 ,6 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Taichung Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 1650 Taiwan Blvd Sect 4, Taichung 40705, Taiwan
[2] Taichung Armed Forces Gen Hosp, Dept Orthopaed Surg, 348,Sec 2,Chungshan Rd, Taichung 41152, Taiwan
[3] Natl Def Med Ctr, Sch Med, 161,Sec 6,Minquan E Rd, Taipei 11490, Taiwan
[4] HungKuang Univ, Dept Biotechnol, Na 1018,Sec 6,Taiwan Blvd, Taichung 43302, Taiwan
[5] Asia Univ Hosp, Dept Orthoped, 222 Fuxin Rd, Taichung 413, Taiwan
[6] China Med Univ, Dept Publ Hlth, 91 Hsueh Shih Rd, Taichung 40402, Taiwan
[7] Jen Teh Jr Coll Med Nursing & Management, Na 79-9 Shalunhu, Houlong Township 356, Miaoli County, Taiwan
关键词
PCL reconstruction; LARS Artificial graft; MRI; Ingrowth; Scaffold; SINGLE-BUNDLE; AUGMENTATION; INJURIES; LARS; KNEE;
D O I
10.1016/j.knee.2019.11.004
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: This study evaluated the long-term clinical follow-up results of patients who underwent double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction using the Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS). Methods: Patients were assessed using clinical scores that included the Tegner activity level scale, the Lysholm score, and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score. KT-1000 was adopted to assess stability. Radiographs and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate osteoarthritis and LARS condition. Results: This study examined 38 patients, of which follow-up procedures were completed for 33 patients, resulting in a follow-up rate of 86.8%. The average follow-up period was 11.9 +/- 1.2 years (range: 10.3-14.2 years). The median scores of the clinical scales were as follows: Tegner activity score, 6 (range: five to seven); Lysholm score, 90 (range: 67-100); and IKDC score, 89.7 (range: 46-100). The median of the side-to-side difference (SSD) was four millimeters (range: 0-10 mm). In radiographs, the moderate OA rate was 6.9%. MRI results revealed that 26 patients exhibited ingrowth and 11 patients exhibited partial rupture of the LARS. With SSD <= 3 mm set as the standard for successful knee stabilization, the optimal cutoff point of LARS midsubstance thickness in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was 14.3 mm. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up of the studied patients demonstrated the durability of LARS. However, clinical outcomes showed no enhancement using LARS, so it is not recommended for routine use in PCL reconstruction. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:165 / 172
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Imaging of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction: normal postsurgical appearance and complications [J].
Alcala-Galiano, Andrea ;
Baeva, Maria ;
Ismael, Maryem ;
Jose Argueeso, Maria .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2014, 43 (12) :1659-1668
[2]   Autograft Versus Allograft for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-analysis [J].
Belk, John W. ;
Kraeutler, Matthew J. ;
Purcell, Justin M. ;
McCarty, Eric C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPORTS MEDICINE, 2018, 46 (07) :1752-1757
[3]   MRI OF THE KNEE FOLLOWING PROSTHETIC ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION [J].
CASSARPULLICINO, VN ;
MCCALL, IW ;
STROVER, AE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (02) :89-99
[4]   Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of 441 Patients at a Minimum 2 Years' Follow-up [J].
Chahla, Jorge ;
Moatshe, Gilbert ;
Cinque, Mark E. ;
Dornan, Grant J. ;
Mitchell, Justin J. ;
Ridley, Taylor J. ;
LaPrade, Robert F. .
ARTHROSCOPY-THE JOURNAL OF ARTHROSCOPIC AND RELATED SURGERY, 2017, 33 (11) :2066-2080
[5]   A review of the anatomical, biomechanical and kinematic findings of posterior cruciate ligament injury with respect to non-operative management [J].
Chandrasekaran, Sivashankar ;
Ma, David ;
Scarvell, Jennifer M. ;
Woods, Kevin R. ;
Smith, Paul N. .
KNEE, 2012, 19 (06) :738-745
[6]   Magnetic resonance imaging of surgically confirmed anterior cruciate ligament graft disruption [J].
Collins, Mark S. ;
Unruh, Kenneth P. ;
Bond, Jeffrey R. ;
Mandrekar, Jayawant N. .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 37 (03) :233-243
[7]   POSTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT INJURIES IN TRAUMA PATIENTS .2. [J].
FANELLI, GC ;
EDSON, CJ .
ARTHROSCOPY, 1995, 11 (05) :526-529
[8]   Biological augmentation of graft healing in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction [J].
Hexter, A. T. ;
Thangarajah, T. ;
Blunn, G. ;
Haddad, F. S. .
BONE & JOINT JOURNAL, 2018, 100B (03) :271-284
[9]   RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT OF OSTEO-ARTHROSIS [J].
KELLGREN, JH ;
LAWRENCE, JS .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1957, 16 (04) :494-502
[10]   Graft sources do not affect to the outcome of transtibial posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review [J].
Lee, Yong Seuk ;
Lee, Seung Hoon ;
Lee, O-Sung .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 2018, 138 (08) :1103-1116