Prophylactic administration of tirofiban for preventing thromboembolic events in flow diversion treatment of intracranial aneurysms

被引:18
作者
Wu, Qiaowei
Shao, Qiuji
Li, Li
Liang, Xiaodong
Chang, Kaitao
Li, Tianxiao [1 ,2 ]
He, Yingkun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Zhengzhou Univ, Henan Prov Peoples Hosp, Peoples Hosp, Dept Cerebrovasc Dis, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
[2] Henan Univ, Peoples Hosp, Zhengzhou 450000, Peoples R China
关键词
flow diverter; aneurysm; platelets; complication; PIPELINE EMBOLIZATION DEVICE; PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION; ANTIPLATELET THERAPY; ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT; CEREBRAL ANEURYSMS; RESCUE TREATMENT; MULTICENTER; COMPLICATIONS; RISK; PROTOCOL;
D O I
10.1136/neurintsurg-2020-016878
中图分类号
R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
100207 ;
摘要
Background Flow diverter (FD) is widely used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. However, thromboembolic events (TEs) continue to be the major complications during the periprocedural phase. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the prophylactic use of tirofiban, combined with the conventional dual antiplatelet therapy (DAT), as a new antiplatelet protocol in patients with intracranial aneurysms treated with FDs. Methods At least 3-5 days before the procedure, daily DAT were administrated to the patients. Tirofiban was administered as an intravenous bolus (5 mu g/kg) over a 3 min period during or immediately after FD deployment, followed by a 0.05 mu g/kg/min maintenance infusion for 24-48 hours. Periprocedural TEs and hemorrhagic events (HEs) were recorded. Results A total of 331 patients were included, including 229 (69.2%) who received tirofiban administration (tirofiban group) and 102 (30.8%) who received only DAT (non-tirofiban group). Periprocedural TEs occurred in 12 (3.6%) patients, including eight (7.8%) in the non-tirofiban group and four (1.7%) in the tirofiban group. In multivariate analysis, patients receiving tirofiban administration had significantly lower TEs as compared with those who received only DAT (P=0.004). Balloon angioplasty and longer procedure time (>137 min) were also risk factors for TEs. Also, no increase was observed in the rate of HEs related to tirofiban administration. Conclusions The current study suggested that prophylactic administration of tirofiban combined with conventional oral DAT seems safe and efficient for preventing TEs during FD treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Balloon angioplasty and prolonged procedure are associated with a high risk of TEs.
引用
收藏
页码:835 / 840
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Flow diversion of fusiform intracranial aneurysms
    Andrew Griffin
    Emily Lerner
    Adam Zuchowski
    Ali Zomorodi
    L. Fernando Gonzalez
    Erik F. Hauck
    Neurosurgical Review, 2021, 44 : 1471 - 1478
  • [42] Flow Diversion Endovascular Treatment Improves Headaches in Patients with Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms
    Maragkos, Georgios A.
    Cordell, Sarah
    Gomez-Paz, Santiago
    Dodge, Laura E.
    Salem, Mohamed M.
    Ascanio, Luis C.
    DiNobile, Diane
    Alturki, Abdulrahman Y.
    Moore, Justin M.
    Ogilvy, Chiristopher S.
    Thomas, Ajith J.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 140 : E140 - E147
  • [43] Flow Diversion for Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in Pediatric Patients: Multicenter Case Series
    Cherian, Jacob
    Srinivasan, Visish
    Froehler, Michael T.
    Grossberg, Jonathan A.
    Cawley, C. Michael
    Hanel, Ricardo A.
    Puri, Ajit
    Dumont, Travis
    Ducruet, Andrew F.
    Albuquerque, Felipe
    Arthur, Adam
    Cheema, Ahmed
    Spiotta, Alejandro
    Anadani, Mohammad
    Lopes, Demetrius
    Saied, Ahmed
    Kim, Louis
    Kelly, Cory M.
    Chen, Peng Roc
    Mocco, J.
    De Leacy, Reade
    Powers, Ciaran J.
    Grandhi, Ramesh
    Fargen, Kyle M.
    Chen, Stephen R.
    Johnson, Jeremiah N.
    Lam, Sandi
    Kan, Peter
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 87 (01) : 53 - 62
  • [44] Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms in a Peruvian Cohort: Experiences from a Limited-Resource Setting and Barriers to Implementation
    Solis, Frank
    Plasencia, Andres
    Wahlster, Sarah
    Walker, Melanie
    Levitt, Michael R.
    Ecos, Rosa
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2023, 180 : 79 - 85
  • [45] Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysms Beyond the Circle of Willis
    Yu, Jinlu
    Lv, Xianli
    FRONTIERS IN NEUROLOGY, 2021, 12
  • [46] Matched Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coiling in Small, Noncomplex Intracranial Aneurysms
    Chalouhi, Nohra
    Daou, Badih
    Barros, Guilherme
    Starke, Robert M.
    Chitale, Ameet
    Ghobrial, George
    Dalyai, Richard
    Hasan, David
    Gonzalez, L. Fernando
    Tjoumakaris, Stavropoula
    Rosenwasser, Robert H.
    Jabbour, Pascal
    NEUROSURGERY, 2017, 81 (01) : 92 - 96
  • [47] Flow Diversion for Intracranial Aneurysm Treatment: Trials Involving Flow Diverters and Long-Term Outcomes
    Chancellor, Bree
    Raz, Eytan
    Shapiro, Maksim
    Tanweer, Omar
    Nossek, Erez
    Riina, Howard A.
    Nelson, Peter Kim
    NEUROSURGERY, 2020, 86 : S36 - S45
  • [48] A novel flow diverter device (Tubridge) for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Fan, Yingjun
    Lei, Jun
    Fei, Fan
    Liu, Jun
    Liu, Yanhui
    NEUROSURGICAL REVIEW, 2023, 46 (01)
  • [49] Hemodynamic Effect of Flow Diverter and Coils in Treatment of Large and Giant Intracranial Aneurysms
    Jing, Linkai
    Zhong, Jingru
    Liu, Jian
    Yang, Xinjian
    Paliwal, Nikhil
    Meng, Hui
    Wang, Shengzhang
    Zhang, Ying
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2016, 89 : 199 - 207
  • [50] Timing, type, and impact of thromboembolic events caused by flow diversion: a 10-year experience
    Ramirez-Velandia, Felipe
    Filo, Jean
    Enriquez-Marulanda, Alejandro
    Fodor, Thomas B.
    Sconzo, Daniel
    Young, Michael
    Muram, Sandeep
    Granstein, Justin H.
    Shutran, Max
    Taussky, Philipp
    Ogilvy, Christopher S.
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY, 2025, 142 (01) : 78 - 87