Rescue of Failed Aortic Repair with Fenestrated Endovascular Device

被引:4
作者
Kiernan, Aoife [1 ]
Elsherif, Mohamed [1 ]
Fahey, Brian [1 ]
Canning, Caitriona [1 ]
Moloney, Tony [2 ]
Kavanagh, Eamon [2 ]
O'Callaghan, Adrian [1 ]
O'Neill, Sean [1 ]
Madhavan, Prakash [1 ]
Martin, Zenia [1 ]
机构
[1] St James Hosp, St Jamess Vasc Inst, Dublin 8, Ireland
[2] Univ Hosp Limerick, Dept Vasc Surg, Limerick, Ireland
关键词
ANEURYSM REPAIR; FOLLOW-UP; DURABILITY; ENDOGRAFTS; EVAR; PREDICTORS; ENDOLEAK;
D O I
10.1016/j.avsg.2021.11.007
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction: The incidence of failed endovascular (EVAR) and open repair (OR) is increasing. Redo aortic repair is required in 10% of patients. Extension of the proximal sealing zone above the visceral arteries to adequate, healthier thoracic aorta using a fenestrated graft (FEVAR) can rescue a failing repair. A custom-made device can treat proximal type 1a endoleaks or proximal dilatation post endovascular or open repair, respectively. The aim of this investigation was to present a single-centre experience with FEVAR for patients with a failing aortic repair. Methods: A prospectively maintained database of FEVAR patients treated with a Zenith (R) Fenestrated endovascular (ZFEN) device (Cook Medical LLC, Bloomington, Indiana, USA) was interrogated for individuals who had the device implanted as a rescue therapy after prior endovascular (EVAR) or open repair (OR). Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS v 25 software. Results: Between January 1, 2011 and March 31, 2019, 17 ZFEN devices were implanted. 10 patients had a type 1a endoleak from a prior EVAR and 7 patients had proximal disease progression after prior OR. There were 12 males and 5 females, median age of 75 (interquartile range, IQR 7). 76.4% (n = 13) of patients had an American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) grade of 3. Primary technical success was 70.5% (n = 12). Of the remainder, 4 cases (24%) had a type III endoleak at completion angiogram; of which, 2 patients (12%) required re-intervention within 30 days. One further case (6%) had primary assisted technical success as stenting of a flow limiting dissection flap in an iliac vessel was required. Peri-operative rate of deployment related complications and systemic complications were 5.8% (n = 1) and 35% (n = 6), respectively. Median length of hospital stay was 11 days (IQR 11). There was no mortality within the study follow up. Overall 30-day re-intervention rate was 23.5%. Overall survival was 92% at one year. Conclusion: FEVAR is a safe but technically challenging option for rescue of failing aortic repairs. These are a high-risk group of patients and this is reflected in the high post-operative morbidity rate. Technical success was high and 30-day mortality was low.
引用
收藏
页码:265 / 275
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] Durability of open repair of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm:: A 15-year follow-up study
    Biancari, F
    Ylönen, K
    Anttila, V
    Juvonen, J
    Romsi, P
    Satta, J
    Juvonen, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (01) : 87 - 93
  • [2] Long-term durability of open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair
    Conrad, Mark F.
    Crawford, Robert S.
    Pedraza, Juan D.
    Brewster, David C.
    LaMuraglia, Glenn M.
    Corey, Michael
    Abbara, Sulmy
    Cambria, Richard P.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 46 (04) : 669 - 675
  • [3] Associated factors, timing, and technical aspects of late failure following open surgical aneurysm repairs
    Coscas, Raphael
    Greenberg, Roy K.
    Mastracci, Tara M.
    Eagleton, Matthew
    King, Woong C.
    Morales, Catherine
    Hernandez, Adrian V.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2010, 52 (02) : 272 - 281
  • [4] Management of failed endovascular aortic aneurysm repair with explantation or fenestrated-branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Dias, Agenor P.
    Farivar, Behzad S.
    Steenberge, Sean P.
    Brier, Corey
    Kuramochi, Yuki
    Lyden, Sean P.
    Eagleton, Matthew J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (06) : 1676 - +
  • [5] Reinterventions after fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
    Dossabhoy, Shernaz S.
    Simons, Jessica P.
    Diamond, Kyle R.
    Flahive, Julie M.
    Aiello, Francesco A.
    Arous, Edward J.
    Messina, Louis M.
    Schanzer, Andres
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (03) : 669 - 681
  • [6] Management of Type IA Endoleak After EVAR by Explantation or Custom Made Fenestrated Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Doumenc, Benoit
    Mesnard, Thomas
    Patterson, Benjamin O.
    Azzaoui, Richard
    De Preville, Agathe
    Haulon, Stephan
    Sobocinski, Jonathan
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2021, 61 (04) : 571 - 578
  • [7] Rescue of failed endovascular aortic aneurysm repair using the fenestrated Anaconda device
    Falkensammer, Juergen
    Taher, Fadi
    Uhlmann, Miriam
    Hirsch, Kornelia
    Strassegger, Johannes
    Assadian, Afshin
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2017, 66 (05) : 1334 - 1339
  • [8] Systematic review and meta-analysis of elective and urgent late open conversion after failed endovascular aneurysm repair
    Goudeketting, Seline R.
    Jin, P. H. Ping Fung Kon
    Unlu, Cagdas
    de Vries, Jean-Paul P. M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (02) : 615 - +
  • [9] Endovascular treatment of aneurysms using fenestrated-branched endografts with distal inverted iliac limbs
    Jain, Vikalp
    Banga, Peter
    Vallabhaneni, Raghuveer
    Eagleton, Matthew
    Oderich, Gustavo
    Farber, Mark A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2016, 64 (03) : 600 - 604
  • [10] Fenestrated Stent-Grafts for Salvage of Prior Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair
    Katsargyris, A.
    Yazar, O.
    Oikonomou, K.
    Bekkema, F.
    Tielliu, I.
    Verhoeven, E. L. G.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 46 (01) : 49 - 56