Wind power integration and power system flexibility-An empirical analysis of extreme events in Germany under the new negative price regime

被引:146
作者
Nicolosi, Marco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cologne EWI, Inst Energy Econ, D-50827 Cologne, Germany
关键词
Electricity markets; Negative prices; Wind power integration; MARKET;
D O I
10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.002
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
In this article, the flexibility of the German power market with respect to the integration of an increasing share of electricity from renewable energy sources was analysed. Flexibility limiting system components, which cause negative prices, are explained and illustrated for the German market. The decision of the European Energy Exchange in Leipzig to allow negative price bids is then explained. The empirical data illustrate the flexibility of conventional generating capacities in Germany from October 2008 to December 2009. Of the 86 h of negative spot prices, 19 h were significantly negative, with prices of at least -100 epsilon/MWh. These extreme hours were analysed in greater detail by the examination of different system components. Thereby, load, wind power infeed and conventional generation by fuel type were observed, as well as the market for negative tertiary reserve, as indicators for market tightness. Although the market situations were found to be severe, under the current conditions, it could have been much worse. In order to enable the market to clear at all times, policy recommendations are provided and long-run implications of an increasing RES-E share on the conventional generation capacity are discussed. The article concludes with an outlook on additional power system flexibility options. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:7257 / 7268
页数:12
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], LANGFR STRAT AUSB ER
[2]   Design criteria for implementing a capacity mechanism in deregulated electricity markets [J].
Instituto de Investigación Tecnológica, Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Sta. Cruz de Marcenado 26, 28015 Madrid, Spain .
Util. Policy, 2008, 3 (184-193) :184-193
[3]  
*BDEW, 2010, EEG WIND EN EINSP
[4]  
*BMU, 2009, EE ZAHL NAT INT ENTW
[5]  
*BMU, 2010, ENTW ERN EN DEUTSCHL
[6]  
*BNETZA, 2010, AUSGL AUSF 22
[7]  
*BNETZA, 2010, VERM EEG EN AUSGLMEC
[8]  
BODE S, 2006, 356 HWWA HAMB I INT
[9]  
Brunekreeft G., 2005, Utilities Policy, V13, P73, DOI 10.1016/j.jup.2004.12.002
[10]   Forward reliability markets: Less risk, less market power, more efficiency [J].
Economics Department, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, United States ;
不详 .
Util. Policy, 2008, 3 (194-201) :194-201