Exergetic and exergoeconomic studies of two highly efficient power-cooling cogeneration systems based on the Kalina and absorption refrigeration cycles

被引:44
作者
Rashidi, Jouan [1 ]
Yoo, Chang Kyoo [1 ]
机构
[1] Kyung Hee Univ, Ctr Environm Studies, Coll Engn, Dept Environm Sci & Engn, Seocheon Dong 1, Yongin 446701, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
Absorption chiller; Exergoeconomic analysis; Exergy; Kalina cycle; Power and cooling cogeneration; ENERGY-UTILIZATION; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; TRANSPORTATION SECTOR; THERMODYNAMIC CYCLE; INDUSTRIAL SECTOR; PLANT; EMISSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2017.05.195
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
Recent technological developments have made it possible to generate power and cooling using the Kalina cycle (KC) through low grade heat sources utilization. The Kalina cooling-power cycle (KPCC) and Kalina LiBr-H2O absorption chiller cycle (KLACC) are two novel cases that have been proposed and analyzed with regard to their energetic and economic aspects. These systems combine the KC with NH3-H2O and LiBr-H2O absorption chillers, respectively. Having obtained the energy analysis results, exergy analysis is performed to analyze and compare the systems. A comparative exergoeconomic assessment is performed to obtain the unit cost of power-cooling generation. The exergetic analysis demonstrated total exergy destruction of KLACC is 40% higher than KPCC where major exergy destruction occurs in both condenser and second flash tank preheater. The KLACC exergetic efficiency is almost same as the KC although it is higher for KPCC system by 6.8%. According to the exergoeconomic analysis, the unit cost of power-cooling generation for KPCC is 20.5% lower than KLACC; therefore, KPCC performance is better than KLACC. The significant exergy destruction locations to optimize the system performance are the absorber in KPCC and second condenser in KLACC. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1023 / 1037
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Thermodynamic and exergoenvironmental analyses, and multi-objective optimization of a gas turbine power plant [J].
Ahmadi, Pouria ;
Dincer, Ibrahim .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2011, 31 (14-15) :2529-2540
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2007, 3LSEVIER SCI
[3]  
Bejan A, 1996, Thermal Design and Optimization
[4]   Exergetic and economic comparison of ORC and Kalina cycle for low temperature enhanced geothermal system in Brazil [J].
Campos Rodriguez, Carlos Eymel ;
Escobar Palacio, Jose Carlos ;
Venturini, Osvaldo J. ;
Silva Lora, Electo E. ;
Cobas, Vladimir Melian ;
dos Santos, Daniel Marques ;
Lofrano Dotto, Fabio R. ;
Gialluca, Vernei .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2013, 52 (01) :109-119
[5]   The role of exergy in energy policy making [J].
Dincer, I .
ENERGY POLICY, 2002, 30 (02) :137-149
[6]   Analysis of sectoral energy and exergy use of Saudi Arabia [J].
Dincer, I ;
Hussain, MM ;
Al-Zaharnah, I .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENERGY RESEARCH, 2004, 28 (03) :205-243
[7]   Energy and exergy utilization in transportation sector of Saudi Arabia [J].
Dincer, I ;
Hussain, MM ;
Al-Zaharnah, I .
APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING, 2004, 24 (04) :525-538
[8]  
Dincer I, 2004, ENERG POLICY, V32, P1615, DOI 10.1016/80301-4215(03)00132-0
[9]   Exergy and exergoeconomic analysis of sustainable direct steam generation solar power plants [J].
Elsafi, Amin M. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2015, 103 :338-347
[10]   Exergy analysis of the Norwegian society [J].
Ertesvåg, IS ;
Mielnik, M .
ENERGY, 2000, 25 (10) :957-973