Liquid compared with conventional cervical cytology - A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:302
作者
Arbyn, Marc [1 ]
Bergeron, Christine
Klinkhamer, Paul
Martin-Hirsch, Pierre
Siebers, Albertus G.
Bulten, Johan
机构
[1] Sci Inst Publ Hlth, Canc Epidemiol Unit, Brussels, Belgium
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.AOG.0000296488.85807.b3
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To compare test performance characteristics of conventional Pap tests and liquid-based cervical cytology samples. DATA SOURCES: Eligible studies, published between 1991 and 2007 were retrieved through PubMed/EmBase searching and completed by consultation of other sources. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected if a conventional and a liquid-based sample were prepared from the same woman or when one or the other type of sample was taken from a separate but similar cohort. The current systematic review and meta-analysis is restricted to studies where all subjects were submitted to gold standard verification, based on colposcopy and histology of colposcopy-targeted biopsies, allowing computation of absolute and relative test validity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse. Randomized trials were selected as well if all test-positive cases were verified with the same gold standard, allowing computation of the relative sensitivity. Impact of study characteristics on accuracy was assessed by subgroup meta-analyses, meta-regression, and summary receiver operating characteristic curve regression. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS: The relative sensitivity, pooled from eight studies, with complete gold standard verification and from one randomized clinical trial, did not differ significantly from unity. Also, the specificity, considering high-grade and lowgrade squamous intraepithelial lesions as cutoff, was similar in conventional and liquid cytology. However, a lower pooled specificity was found for liquid-based cytology when presence of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance was the cutoff (ratio 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.84-0.98). Differences in study characteristics did not explain interstudy heterogeneity. CONCLUSION: Liquid-based cervical cytology is neither more sensitive nor more specific for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia compared with the conventional Pap test.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 177
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Performance of ThinPrep liquid-based cervical cytology in comparison with conventionally prepared Papanicolaou smears: a quantitative survey [J].
Abulafia, O ;
Pezzullo, JC ;
Sherer, DM .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (01) :137-144
[2]  
*ANAES, 2002, GUID FOLL PAT HAV AB
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Cervix Cancer Screening
[4]  
[Anonymous], STATA TECH B
[5]  
[Anonymous], LIQ BAS CYT CERV SCR
[6]   Clinical utility of HPV-DNA detection: Triage of minor cervical lesions, follow-up of women treated for high-grade CIN: An update of pooled evidence [J].
Arbyn, M ;
Paraskevaidis, E ;
Martin-Hirsch, P ;
Prendiville, W ;
Dillner, J .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2005, 99 (03) :S7-S11
[7]   Virologic versus cytologic triage of women with equivocal pap smears: A meta-analysis of the accuracy to detect high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia [J].
Arbyn, M ;
Buntinx, F ;
Van Ranst, M ;
Paraskevaidis, E ;
Martin-Hirsch, P ;
Dillner, J .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2004, 96 (04) :280-293
[8]  
ARBYN M, 2003, 10 SCI I PUBL HLTH
[9]   Clinical applications of HPV testing: A summary of meta-analyses [J].
Arbyn, Marc ;
Sasieni, Peter ;
Meijer, Chris J. L. M. ;
Clavel, Christine ;
Koliopoulos, George ;
Dillner, Joakim .
VACCINE, 2006, 24 :78-89
[10]  
Austin RM, 1998, ACTA CYTOL, V42, P178