Regional long-term production modeling from a single well test, Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope

被引:160
作者
Anderson, Brian J. [1 ,2 ]
Kurihara, Masanori [3 ]
White, Mark D. [4 ]
Moridis, George J. [5 ]
Wilson, Scott J. [6 ]
Pooladi-Darvish, Mehran [7 ]
Gaddipati, Manohar [1 ,2 ]
Masuda, Yoshihiro [8 ]
Collett, Timothy S. [9 ]
Hunter, Robert B. [10 ]
Narita, Hideo [11 ]
Rose, Kelly [2 ]
Boswell, Ray [2 ]
机构
[1] W Virginia Univ, Dept Chem Engn, NETL IAES, Morgantown, WV 26506 USA
[2] Natl Energy Technol Lab, Morgantown, WV 26507 USA
[3] Japan Oil Engn Co Ltd, Chuo Ku, Tokyo 1040054, Japan
[4] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Hydrol Grp, Richland, WA 99352 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Div Earth Sci, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[6] Ryder Scott Co LP, Denver, CO 80120 USA
[7] Fekete Associates Inc, Calgary, AB T2P 0M2, Canada
[8] Univ Tokyo, Dept Geosyst Engn, Tokyo 1138654, Japan
[9] US Geol Survey, Denver Fed Ctr, Denver, CO 80225 USA
[10] ASRC Energy Serv, Anchorage, AK 99503 USA
[11] Natl Inst Adv Ind Sci & Technol, Methane Hydrate Res Lab, Sapporo, Hokkaido 0628517, Japan
关键词
Gas hydrates; Reservoir simulations; Production modeling; Porous media;
D O I
10.1016/j.marpetgeo.2010.01.015
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Following the results from the open-hole formation pressure response test in the BPXA-DOE-USGS Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well (Mount Elbert well) using Schluinberger's Modular Dynamics Formation Tester (MDT) wireline tool, the International Methane Hydrate Reservoir Simulator Code Comparison project performed long-term reservoir simulations on three different model reservoirs. These descriptions were based on 1) the Mount Elbert gas hydrate accumulation as delineated by an extensive history-matching exercise, 2) an estimation of the hydrate accumulation near the Prudhoe Bay L-pad, and 3) a reservoir that would be down-dip of the Prudhoe Bay L-pad and therefore warmer and deeper. All of these simulations were based, in part, on the results of the MDT results from the Mount Elbert Well. The comparison group's consensus value for the initial permeability of the hydrate-filled reservoir (k = 0.12 mD) and the permeability model based on the MDT history match were used as the basis for subsequent simulations on the three regional scenarios. The simulation results of the five different simulation codes, CMG STARS, HydrateResSirn, MH-21 HYDRES, STOMP-HYD, and TOUGH+HYDRATE exhibit good qualitative agreement and the variability of potential methane production rates from gas hydrate reservoirs is illustrated. As expected, the predicted methane production rate increased with increasing in situ reservoir temperature; however, a significant delay in the onset of rapid hydrate dissociation is observed for a cold, homogeneous reservoir and it is found to be repeatable. The inclusion of reservoir heterogeneity in the description of this cold reservoir is shown to eliminate this delayed production. Overall, simulations utilized detailed information collected across the Mount Elbert reservoir either obtained or determined from geophysical well logs, including thickness (37 ft), porosity (35%), hydrate saturation (65%), intrinsic permeability (1000 mD), pore water salinity (5 ppt), and formation temperature (3.3-3.9 degrees C). This paper presents the approach and results of extrapolating regional forward production modeling from history-matching efforts on the results from a single well test. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 501
页数:9
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Formation pressure testing at the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Operational summary, history matching, and interpretations [J].
Anderson, Brian ;
Hancock, Steve ;
Wilson, Scott ;
Enger, Christopher ;
Collett, Timothy ;
Boswell, Ray ;
Hunter, Robert .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :478-492
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Petroleum Reservoir Simulation
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CMG STARS
[4]   Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Overview of scientific and technical program [J].
Hunter, Robert B. ;
Collett, Timothy S. ;
Boswell, Ray ;
Anderson, Brian J. ;
Digert, Scott A. ;
Pospisil, Gordon ;
Baker, Richard ;
Weeks, Micaela .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :295-310
[5]  
Inks T.L., 2009, American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir, V89
[6]  
Moridis G., 2005, HydrateResSim Users Manual: A Numerical Simulator for Modeling the Behavior of Hydrates in Geologic Media
[7]  
Moridis G. J, 2008, LBNL00149E
[8]   Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope: Coring operations, core sedimentology, and lithostratigraphy [J].
Rose, Kelly ;
Boswell, Ray ;
Collett, Timothy .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :311-331
[9]   PROBABILITY MODEL FOR ESTIMATING 3-PHASE RELATIVE PERMEABILITY [J].
STONE, HL .
JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM TECHNOLOGY, 1970, 22 :214-&
[10]   Pore fluid geochemistry from the Mount Elbert Gas Hydrate Stratigraphic Test Well, Alaska North Slope [J].
Torres, M. E. ;
Collett, T. S. ;
Rose, K. K. ;
Sample, J. C. ;
Agena, W. F. ;
Rosenbaum, E. J. .
MARINE AND PETROLEUM GEOLOGY, 2011, 28 (02) :332-342