Dilemmas in developing models for long-term drought risk management: The case of the National Water Model of the Netherlands

被引:14
作者
Mens, Marjolein [1 ]
Minnema, Bennie [1 ]
Overmars, Koen [2 ]
van den Hurk, Bart [1 ]
机构
[1] Deltares, Boussinesqweg 1, NL-2629 HV Delft, Netherlands
[2] Rijkswaterstaat, Zuiderwagenpl 2, NL-8224 AD Lelystad, Netherlands
关键词
National water model; Large-scale integrated modelling; National policy-making; Regional stakeholder support; Risk-based decision-making; Drought risk management; Dutch delta programme; Climate change; Model requirements; Meta-modelling; CPU-Time; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105100
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Strategic decision-making on long-term drought risk management can be supported by integrated assessment models to explore uncertain future conditions and potential policy actions. Such models have to meet many - sometimes conflicting - requirements posed by policy-makers, model developers, and stakeholders. This paper discusses the case of the National Water Model (NWM) that is applied for national policy-making on drought risk management in the Netherlands. The case demonstrates that the chosen assembled model set-up (in which several existing models are combined) is cost-effective and increases stakeholder acceptance, but also leads to high model complexity and computation time. To be effective for policy-making, integrated assessment models need to produce relevant model outcomes that are accepted by stakeholders, within acceptable time and cost limits. For this, the model set-up must support simulations at different aggregation levels (allowing both detailed analysis and exploratory analysis of many scenario/strategy combinations) while maintaining internal consistency.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 56 条
[1]  
Abrahamse A., 1982, POLICY ANAL WATER MA, VXII
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, WATER RESOUR RES, DOI DOI 10.1002/2015WR017198
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1984, NAT POL MEM WAT MAN
[4]   Characterising performance of environmental models [J].
Bennett, Neil D. ;
Croke, Barry F. W. ;
Guariso, Giorgio ;
Guillaume, Joseph H. A. ;
Hamilton, Serena H. ;
Jakeman, Anthony J. ;
Marsili-Libelli, Stefano ;
Newham, Lachlan T. H. ;
Norton, John P. ;
Perrin, Charles ;
Pierce, Suzanne A. ;
Robson, Barbara ;
Seppelt, Ralf ;
Voinov, Alexey A. ;
Fath, Brian D. ;
Andreassian, Vazken .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2013, 40 :1-20
[5]  
Booij MJ, 2003, IAHS-AISH P, P115
[6]  
Bos H., 1997, 97062 RIZA
[7]   Strategies for urban drought risk management: a comparison of 10 large cities [J].
Buurman, Joost ;
Mens, Marjolein J. P. ;
Dahm, Ruben J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2017, 33 (01) :31-50
[8]   Knowledge systems for sustainable development [J].
Cash, DW ;
Clark, WC ;
Alcock, F ;
Dickson, NM ;
Eckley, N ;
Guston, DH ;
Jäger, J ;
Mitchell, RB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2003, 100 (14) :8086-8091
[9]  
Davis P.K., 1998, MR1004DARPA RAND COR
[10]   An operational, multi-scale, multi-model system for consensus-based, integrated water management and policy analysis: The Netherlands Hydrological Instrument [J].
De Lange, Willem J. ;
Prinsen, Geert F. ;
Hoogewoud, Jacco C. ;
Veldhuizen, Albert A. ;
Verkaik, Jarno ;
Essink, Gualbert H. P. Oude ;
van Walsum, Paul E. V. ;
Delsman, Joost R. ;
Hunink, Joachim C. ;
Massop, Harry Th. L. ;
Kroon, Timo .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2014, 59 :98-108