Optimizing staggered-grid finite-difference method based on the least-squares combination of the square window function

被引:4
作者
Chen, Chao-pu [1 ]
Liu, Hong [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Zhi-yang [1 ]
Bai, Wen-lei [1 ]
Zhang, Cheng-fang [1 ]
Meng, Zi-rui [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Univ Chem Technol, Coll Informat Sci & Technol, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[2] Chinese Acad Sci, Key Lab Petr Resources Res, Inst Geol & Geophys, Beijing 100029, Peoples R China
[3] Univ Chinese Acad Sci, Beijing 100049, Peoples R China
来源
APPLIED GEOPHYSICS | 2021年
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
staggered-grid finite-difference; window function; least squares; dispersion; elastic wave; WAVE-EQUATION; SCHEMES; APPROXIMATION; PROPAGATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11770-021-0884-4
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The staggered-grid finite-difference method (SGFDM) has been extensively employed in numerical modeling, seismic imaging, and waveform inversion because of its high efficiency, accuracy, and practicality. Numerical modeling accuracy is crucial for imaging and inversion. Truncating the spatial convolution sequence of the pseudospectral method by window functions can derive the finite-difference method. However, truncation error is inevitable; it can create illusions in numerical modeling, leading to misjudgments. To reduce the truncation error and improve numerical modeling accuracy, enhancing the performance of the truncated window function is imperative. In this study, a new optimal window function was investigated based on the least-squares combination of square windows. Then, the new optimized window function was used to truncate the spatial convolution sequence of the pseudospectral method and obtain an optimized SGFDM. Dispersion analysis showed that the optimized SGFDM has wider spectrum coverage than the conventional SGFDM at the same order. In addition, at low orders, the error range of the new optimized SGFDM could be strictly controlled within 1 parts per thousand, whereas, at high orders, while ensuring accuracy, the spectrum coverage significantly improved. Finally, numerical modeling for elastic waves demonstrated that the optimized SGFDM could superiorly suppress numerical dispersion and improve calculation efficiency.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, CHINESE J GEOPHYS, V59
[2]   Finite-difference modelling of S-wave splitting in anisotropic media [J].
Bansal, Reeshidev ;
Sen, Mrinal K. .
GEOPHYSICAL PROSPECTING, 2008, 56 (03) :293-312
[3]  
Chu CL, 2012, GEOPHYSICS, V77, pW17, DOI [10.1190/GEO2011-0336.1, 10.1190/geo2011-0336.1]
[4]  
[段沛然 Duan Peiran], 2019, [地球物理学进展, Progress in Geophysiscs], V34, P1032
[5]   THE PSEUDOSPECTRAL METHOD - COMPARISONS WITH FINITE-DIFFERENCES FOR THE ELASTIC WAVE-EQUATION [J].
FORNBERG, B .
GEOPHYSICS, 1987, 52 (04) :483-501
[6]   Genetic Quantitative Techniques Combined with Continuous Electromagnetic Profiling to Identify Subtle Oil and Gas Reservoirs [J].
He, Ze ;
Zhang, Min ;
Ning, Zhuo ;
Guo, Caijuan ;
Zhang, Cuiyun ;
Du, Jianjun .
GEOMICROBIOLOGY JOURNAL, 2019, 36 (08) :705-714
[7]   Arbitrary source and receiver positioning in finite-difference schemes using Kaiser windowed sinc functions [J].
Hicks, GJ .
GEOPHYSICS, 2002, 67 (01) :156-166
[8]   ANISOTROPIC WAVE-PROPAGATION THROUGH FINITE-DIFFERENCE GRIDS [J].
IGEL, H ;
MORA, P ;
RIOLLET, B .
GEOPHYSICS, 1995, 60 (04) :1203-1216
[9]   4TH-ORDER FINITE-DIFFERENCE P-SV SEISMOGRAMS [J].
LEVANDER, AR .
GEOPHYSICS, 1988, 53 (11) :1425-1436
[10]  
[李世中 Li Shizhong], 2018, [石油物探, Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum], V57, P378