The Possibilities and Limits of the Demarcation of Science

被引:0
|
作者
Bielik, Lukas [1 ]
机构
[1] Katedra Logiky & Metodol Vied FiF UK, Bratislava 81102 1, Slovakia
来源
FILOZOFIA | 2012年 / 67卷 / 07期
关键词
The demarcation problem; Scientific cognitive field; Non-scientific cognitive field; Pseudoscience; Cognition; The theory of science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The demarcation of science is discussed in a wider context of differentiating the elements of scientific knowledge from non-scientific or pseudoscientific cognitive fields. The traditional episteine/doxa approach fails in differentiating the scientific from non-scientific. To resolve the problem of demarcation the arguments of the demarcation relation have to be made explicit. The heuristics of the explication is seen in the concept of the theory of science. It is suggested that the pluralistic character of the contemporary science should not be conceived as a hindrance to solving the problem of demarcation. Further, the specification of the objects of demarcation on both sides of the demarcation relation makes the possibilities as well as limits of demarcation more visible.
引用
收藏
页码:530 / 544
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Science, pseudo-science and urban design
    Stephen Marshall
    URBAN DESIGN International, 2012, 17 : 257 - 271
  • [32] Is Cognitive Science Usefully Cast as Complexity Science?
    Van Orden, Guy
    Stephen, Damian G.
    TOPICS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2012, 4 (01) : 3 - 6
  • [33] Science, pseudo-science and urban design
    Marshall, Stephen
    URBAN DESIGN INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 17 (04) : 257 - 271
  • [34] Why the studies of science need a psychology of science
    Feist, Gregory J.
    REVIEW OF GENERAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 10 (02) : 183 - 187
  • [35] Archaeological evidence for thinking about possibilities in hominin evolution
    Langley, Michelle C.
    Suddendorf, Thomas
    PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2022, 377 (1866)
  • [36] Cognition, Human Evolution and the Possibilities for an Ethics of Warfare and Peace
    Barreiros, Daniel
    Vainfas, Daniel Ribera
    SOCIAL EVOLUTION & HISTORY, 2020, 19 (02): : 47 - 67
  • [37] The cognitive agent: Overcoming informational limits
    Vakarelov, Orlin
    ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR, 2011, 19 (02) : 83 - 100
  • [38] Editorial: Trust: The Limits of Human Moral
    Mitkidis, Panagiotis
    Porubanova, Michaela
    Roepstorff, Andreas
    FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 8
  • [39] SOME DIRECTIONS AND POSSIBILITIES FOR ENACTIVISM AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION RESEARCH
    Proulx, Jerome
    PME 33: PROCEEDINGS OF THE 33RD CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL GROUP FOR THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MATHEMATICS EDUCATION, VOL 1, 2009, 1 : 270 - 278
  • [40] Options, limits and ethics of pharmacological neuroenhancement
    Normann, C.
    Boldt, J.
    Maio, G.
    Berger, M.
    NERVENARZT, 2010, 81 (01): : 66 - 74