The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form for individuals with intellectual disabilities: Part II: reliability and validity

被引:90
作者
Rojahn, J. [1 ]
Rowe, E. W. [2 ]
Sharber, A. C. [2 ]
Hastings, R. [3 ]
Matson, J. L. [4 ]
Didden, R. [5 ]
Kroes, D. B. H. [6 ]
Dumont, E. L. M. [7 ,8 ]
机构
[1] George Mason Univ, Ctr Cognit Dev, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[2] George Mason Univ, Dept Psychol, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA
[3] Bangor Univ, Sch Psychol, Bangor, Gwynedd, Wales
[4] Louisiana State Univ, Dept Psychol, Baton Rouge, LA 70803 USA
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Behav Sci, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Koraalgroep, Landgraaf, Netherlands
[7] MUMC, Valkenburg Ad Geul, Netherlands
[8] Op de Bies, Psychol Educ, Valkenburg Ad Geul, Netherlands
关键词
Behavior Problems Inventory; factor structure; intellectual disabilities; reliability; validity; DIAGNOSTIC-ASSESSMENT; RATING-FORM; FIT INDEXES; DASH-II; DISORDERS; CHECKLIST; CHILDREN; VALIDATION; ADULTS; SKILLS;
D O I
10.1111/j.1365-2788.2011.01506.x
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background The Behavior Problems Inventory-01 (BPI-01) is an informant-based behaviour rating instrument for intellectual disabilities (ID) with 49 items and three sub-scales: Self-injurious Behavior, Stereotyped Behavior and Aggressive/Destructive Behavior. The Behavior Problems Inventory-Short Form (BPI-S) is a BPI-01 spin-off with 30 items. Methods The psychometric properties of these two versions of the scale were computed using aggregated archival data from nine different sites in the USA, Wales, England, the Netherlands and Romania with a total of 1122 cases with a BPI-01 total score >0. Results The internal consistency of the BPI-01 and the BPI-S ranged from fair to excellent with the BPI-01 showing slightly stronger reliability. Construct validity (confirmatory and discriminant) was computed by comparing BPI sub-scale scores with the scores of four other behaviour rating scales (the Aberrant Behavior Checklist, the Diagnostic Assessment for the Severely Handicapped-II, the Nisonger Child Behavior Rating Form and the Inventory for Client and Agency Planning). Strong evidence for confirmatory and discriminant validity was found for both the BPI-01 and the BPI-S. Confirmatory fit indices for the BPI and the BPI-S were comparable and suggesting that the factor structures fit the data well. Conclusion In summary, both BPI versions were found to be equally sound psychometrically and can be endorsed for future use. However, independent future studies are needed to replicate the psychometrics of the BPI-S with new data.
引用
收藏
页码:546 / 565
页数:20
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
Aman M.G., 1985, AM J MENT DEFIC, V89, P495
[2]  
AMAN MG, 1987, AM J MENT DEF, V92, P237
[3]  
AMAN MG, 1985, AM J MENT DEF, V89, P492
[4]   The Nisonger CBRF: A child behavior rating form for children with developmental disabilities [J].
Aman, MG ;
Tasse, MJ ;
Rojahn, J ;
Hammer, D .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 1996, 17 (01) :41-57
[5]  
Aman MG, 1986, Aberrant behavior checklist manual
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2000, DIAGN STAT MAN, V4th
[7]  
BIHM EM, 1991, AM J MENT RETARD, V96, P209
[8]  
Bruininks R.H., 1986, EXAMINERS MANUAL ICA
[9]   Understanding and intervening with the challenging behavior of young children with autism spectrum disorder [J].
Buschbacher, PW ;
Fox, L .
LANGUAGE SPEECH AND HEARING SERVICES IN SCHOOLS, 2003, 34 (03) :217-227
[10]  
Cicchetti D., 1990, DEVELOPMENTAL ASSESS, P173