The N1 hypothesis and irrelevant sound:: evidence from token set size effects

被引:33
作者
Campbell, T
Winkler, I
Kujala, T
Näätänen, R
机构
[1] Hungarian Acad Sci, Inst Psychol, H-1394 Budapest, Hungary
[2] Univ Helsinki, Cognit Brain Res Unit, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Brain Res Ctr, Helsinki, Finland
[4] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Collegium Adv Studies, Helsinki, Finland
来源
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH | 2003年 / 18卷 / 01期
关键词
token set size; irrelevant sound effect; auditory N1; immediate memory; serial recall;
D O I
10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.09.001
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This study investigated how increases in the number of different types of sound (token set size) within a heard but ignored sequence influence brain activity and performance in a serial recall task (the irrelevant sound effect). We tested the hypothesis that brain processes affected by the refractory state of the neuronal populations involved in generating the auditory N1 play a role in the memory disruption produced by irrelevant sound. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded when volunteers performed a serial recall task that required remembering lists of visually presented numbers that were followed by a distractor-filled retention interval. The results showed that both increments in set size from 1 to 2 and from 2 to 5 elicited an increase of the N1 amplitude. Furthermore, increases in set size from 2 to 5, but not from 1 to 2, caused a significant decrease of the serial recall performance. This result suggested that, if N1 were to play a role in the disruption produced by irrelevant sound, the processes underlying the N1 wave may only serve as a necessary rather than a sufficient condition for disruption. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 47
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[11]   CONVERGING EVIDENCE ABOUT INFORMATION-PROCESSING [J].
COWAN, N .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 1990, 13 (02) :237-237
[12]  
Cowan N., 1995, ATTENTION MEMORY INT, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195119107.001.0001
[13]   Individual differences in susceptibility to the ''irrelevant speech effect'' [J].
Ellermeier, W ;
Zimmer, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1997, 102 (04) :2191-2199
[14]   Neural mechanisms of involuntary attention to acoustic novelty and change [J].
Escera, C ;
Alho, K ;
Winkler, I ;
t nen, RN .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (05) :590-604
[15]   An electrophysiological and behavioral investigation of involuntary attention towards auditory frequency, duration and intensity changes [J].
Escera, C ;
Corral, MJ ;
Yago, E .
COGNITIVE BRAIN RESEARCH, 2002, 14 (03) :325-332
[16]   Electrical responses reveal the temporal dynamics of brain events during involuntary attention switching [J].
Escera, C ;
Yago, E ;
Alho, K .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 14 (05) :877-883
[17]  
Hjorth B., 1980, AM J EEG TECHNOL, V20, P121
[18]  
Howard MA, 2000, J COMP NEUROL, V416, P79, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9861(20000103)416:1<79::AID-CNE6>3.0.CO
[19]  
2-2
[20]  
Hughes Robert, 2001, Noise Health, V4, P51