Mitigating the Attraction Effect with Visualizations

被引:34
作者
Dimara, Evanthia [1 ,2 ]
Bailly, Gilles [1 ]
Bezerianos, Anastasia [3 ,4 ,5 ]
Franconeri, Steven [6 ]
机构
[1] ISIR, Paris, France
[2] INRIA, Paris, France
[3] Univ Paris Sud, Paris, France
[4] CNRS, INRIA, LRI, Paris, France
[5] Univ Paris Saclay, Paris, France
[6] Northwestern Univ, Evanston, IL 60208 USA
关键词
Decision making; cognitive bias; bias alleviation; bias mitigation; debiasing; information visualization; attraction effect; DECISION-MAKING; CHOICE; JUDGMENT; CONTEXT; DECOY; BIAS; STRATEGIES; MODELS; ERROR;
D O I
10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865233
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Human decisions are prone to biases, and this is no less true for decisions made within data visualizations. Bias mitigation strategies often focus on the person, by educating people about their biases, typically with little success. We focus instead on the system, presenting the first evidence that altering the design of an interactive visualization tool can mitigate a strong bias the attraction effect. Participants viewed 2D scatterplots where choices between superior alternatives were affected by the placement of other suboptimal points. We found that highlighting the superior alternatives weakened the bias, but did not eliminate it. We then tested an interactive approach where participants completely removed locally dominated points from the view, inspired by the elimination by aspects strategy in the decision-making literature. This approach strongly decreased the bias, leading to a counterintuitive suggestion: tools that allow removing inappropriately salient or distracting data from a view may help lead users to make more rational decisions.
引用
收藏
页码:850 / 860
页数:11
相关论文
共 98 条
[1]   Low-level components of analytic activity in information visualization [J].
Amar, R ;
Eagan, J ;
Stasko, J .
INFOVIS 05: IEEE SYMPOSIUM ON INFORMATION VISUALIZATION, PROCEEDINGS, 2005, :111-117
[2]   Excessive confidence in visually-based estimates [J].
Andrade, Eduardo B. .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2011, 116 (02) :252-261
[3]  
[Anonymous], AGR RESOUR EC REV
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, ADAPTIVE DECISION MA
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, P AIAA 1 INT SYST TE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, LECT NOT COMP SCI
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1993, The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making |
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
[9]   COSTS AND BENEFITS OF JUDGMENT ERRORS - IMPLICATIONS FOR DEBIASING [J].
ARKES, HR .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1991, 110 (03) :486-498
[10]   Base-rate respect: From ecological rationality to dual processes [J].
Barbey, Aron K. ;
Sloman, Steven A. .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2007, 30 (03) :241-+