Imaging-Based, Patient-Specific Three-Dimensional Printing to Plan, Train, and Guide Cardiovascular Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background To tailor cardiovascular interventions, the use of three-dimensional (3D), patient-specific phantoms (3DPSP) encompasses patient education, training, simulation, procedure planning, and outcome-prediction. Aim This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the current and future perspective of 3D printing for cardiovascular interventions. Methods We systematically screened articles on Medline and EMBASE reporting the prospective use of 3DPSP in cardiovascular interventions by using combined search terms. Studies that compared intervention time depending on 3DPSP utilisation were included into a meta-analysis. Results We identified 107 studies that prospectively investigated a total of 814 3DPSP in cardiovascular interventions. Most common settings were congenital heart disease (CHD) (38 articles, 6 comparative studies), left atrial appendage (LAA) occlusion (11 articles, 5 comparative, 1 randomised controlled trial [RCT]), and aortic disease (10 articles). All authors described 3DPSP as helpful in assessing complex anatomic conditions, whereas poor tissue mimicry and the non-consideration of physiological properties were cited as limitations. Compared to controls, meta-analysis of six studies showed a significant reduction of intervention time in LAA occlusion (n=3 studies), and surgery due to CHD (n=3) if 3DPSPs were used (Cohen's d=0.54; 95% confidence interval 0.13 to 0.95; p=0.001), however heterogeneity across studies should be taken into account. Conclusions 3DPSP are helpful to plan, train, and guide interventions in patients with complex cardiovascular anatomy. Benefits for patients include reduced intervention time with the potential for lower radiation exposure and shorter mechanical ventilation times. More evidence and RCTs including clinical endpoints are needed to warrant adoption of 3DPSP into routine clinical practice.