Detection of Overreported Psychopathology With the MMPI-2 RF Form Validity Scales

被引:50
作者
Sellbom, Martin [1 ]
Bagby, R. Michael [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Psychol, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] Ctr Addict & Mental Hlth, Dept Clin Res, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Psychol, Toronto, ON M5S 1A1, Canada
关键词
MMPI-2; RF; overreporting; malingering; validity scales; FAKE-BAD SCALE; MALINGERED NEUROCOGNITIVE DYSFUNCTION; POSITIVE IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; NEO PERSONALITY-INVENTORY; FEIGNED MENTAL-DISORDERS; BASE RATES; ATTORNEYS;
D O I
10.1037/a0020825
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We examined the utility of the validity scales on the recently released Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Restructured Form (MMPI-2 RF; Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008) to detect overreported psychopathology. This set of validity scales includes a newly developed scale and revised versions of the original MMPI-2 validity scales. We used an analogue, experimental simulation in which MMPI-2 RF responses (derived from archived MMPI-2 protocols) of undergraduate students instructed to overreport psychopathology (in either a coached or noncoached condition) were compared with those of psychiatric inpatients who completed the MMPI-2 under standardized instructions. The MMPI-2 RF validity scale Infrequent Psychopathology Responses best differentiated the simulation groups from the sample of patients, regardless of experimental condition. No other validity scale added consistent incremental predictive utility to Infrequent Psychopathology Responses in distinguishing the simulation groups from the sample of patients. Classification accuracy statistics confirmed the recommended cut scores in the MMPI-2 RF manual (Ben-Porath & Tellegen, 2008).
引用
收藏
页码:757 / 767
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Base rates of negative response bias and malingered neurocognitive dysfunction among criminal defendants referred for neuropsychological evaluation [J].
Ardolf, Barry R. ;
Denney, Robert L. ;
Houston, Christi M. .
CLINICAL NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST, 2007, 21 (06) :899-916
[2]   Development and validation of the malingering discriminant function index for the MMPI-2 [J].
Bacchiochi, Jason R. ;
Bagby, R. Michael .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2006, 87 (01) :51-61
[3]  
Bagby, 1994, Assessment, V1, P31, DOI 10.1177/1073191194001001005
[4]  
Bagby R.M., 2006, MMPI 2 PRACTITIONERS, P39, DOI DOI 10.1037/11287-003
[5]   Positive impression management and its influence on the revised NEO personality inventory: A comparison of analog and differential prevalence group designs [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Marshall, MB .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2003, 15 (03) :333-339
[6]   The predictive capacity of the MMPI-2 and PAI validity scales and indexes to detect coached and uncoached feigning [J].
Bagby, RM ;
Nicholson, RA ;
Bacchiochi, JR ;
Ryder, AG ;
Bury, AS .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY ASSESSMENT, 2002, 78 (01) :69-86
[7]   Effects of positive impression management on the NEO personality inventory - Revised in a clinical population [J].
Ballenger, JF ;
Caldwell-Andrews, A ;
Baer, RA .
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT, 2001, 13 (02) :254-260
[8]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2011, MMPI 2 RF MINNESOTA
[9]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2003, HDB PSYCHOL ASSESSME, V10, P553, DOI DOI 10.1002/0471264385.WEI1024
[10]  
Ben-Porath Y.S., 2008, MMPI 2 RF MANUAL ADM