EXOPLANET ALBEDO SPECTRA AND COLORS AS A FUNCTION OF PLANET PHASE, SEPARATION, AND METALLICITY

被引:123
作者
Cahoy, Kerri L. [1 ]
Marley, Mark S. [1 ]
Fortney, Jonathan J. [2 ]
机构
[1] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[2] Univ Calif Santa Cruz, Dept Astron & Astrophys, Santa Cruz, CA 95064 USA
关键词
methods: numerical; planets and satellites: general; radiative transfer; scattering; EXTRASOLAR GIANT PLANETS; LIGHT CURVES; MONOCHROMATIC RADIATION; THERMAL STRUCTURE; JOVIAN PLANETS; T-DWARFS; JUPITER; MODELS; ATMOSPHERES; MASS;
D O I
10.1088/0004-637X/724/1/189
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
First generation space-based optical coronagraphic telescopes will obtain images of cool gas-and ice-giant exoplanets around nearby stars. Exoplanets lying at planet-star separations larger than about 1 AU-where an exoplanet can be resolved from its parent star-have spectra that are dominated by reflected light to beyond 1 mu m and punctuated by molecular absorption features. Here, we consider how exoplanet albedo spectra and colors vary as a function of planet-star separation, metallicity, mass, and observed phase for Jupiter and Neptune analogs from 0.35 to 1 mu m. We model Jupiter analogs with 1x and 3x the solar abundance of heavy elements, and Neptune analogs with 10x and 30x the solar abundance of heavy elements. Our model planets orbit a solar analog parent star at separations of 0.8 AU, 2 AU, 5 AU, and 10 AU. We use a radiative-convective model to compute temperature-pressure profiles. The giant exoplanets are found to be cloud-free at 0.8 AU, possess H2O clouds at 2 AU, and have both NH3 and H2O clouds at 5 AU and 10 AU. For each model planet we compute moderate resolution (R = lambda/Delta lambda similar to 800) albedo spectra as a function of phase. We also consider low-resolution spectra and colors that are more consistent with the capabilities of early direct imaging capabilities. As expected, the presence and vertical structure of clouds strongly influence the albedo spectra since cloud particles not only affect optical depth but also have highly directional scattering properties. Observations at different phases also probe different volumes of atmosphere as the source-observer geometry changes. Because the images of the planets themselves will be unresolved, their phase will not necessarily be immediately obvious, and multiple observations will be needed to discriminate between the effects of planet-star separation, metallicity, and phase on the observed albedo spectra. We consider the range of these combined effects on spectra and colors. For example, we find that the spectral influence of clouds depends more on planet-star separation and hence atmospheric temperature than metallicity, and it is easier to discriminate between cloudy 1x and 3x Jupiters than between 10x and 30x Neptunes. In addition to alkalis and methane, our Jupiter models show H2O absorption features near 0.94 mu m. While solar system giant planets are well separated by their broadband colors, we find that arbitrary giant exoplanets can have a large range of possible colors and that color alone cannot be relied upon to characterize planet types. We also predict that giant exoplanets receiving greater insolation than Jupiter will exhibit higher equator-to-pole temperature gradients than are found on Jupiter and thus may exhibit differing atmospheric dynamics. These results are useful for future interpretation of direct imaging exoplanet observations as well as for deriving requirements and designing filters for optical direct imaging instrumentation.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 214
页数:26
相关论文
共 101 条
  • [1] Precipitating condensation clouds in substellar atmospheres
    Ackerman, AS
    Marley, MS
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 556 (02) : 872 - 884
  • [2] New Jupiter and Saturn formation models meet observations
    Alibert, Y
    Mousis, O
    Mordasini, C
    Benz, W
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 626 (01) : L57 - L60
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1975, INT SERIES MONOGRAPH
  • [4] Composition and origin of the atmosphere of Jupiter - an update, and implications for the extrasolar giant planets
    Atreya, SK
    Mahaffy, PR
    Niemann, HB
    Wong, MH
    Owen, TC
    [J]. PLANETARY AND SPACE SCIENCE, 2003, 51 (02) : 105 - 112
  • [5] Imaging Young Giant Planets From Ground and Space
    Beichman, Charles A.
    Krist, John
    Trauger, John T.
    Greene, Tom
    Oppenheimer, Ben
    Sivaramakrishnan, Anand
    Doyon, Rene
    Boccaletti, Anthony
    Barman, Travis S.
    Rieke, Marcia
    [J]. PUBLICATIONS OF THE ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY OF THE PACIFIC, 2010, 122 (888) : 162 - 200
  • [6] Possible rapid gas giant planet formation in the solar nebula and other protoplanetary disks
    Boss, AP
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 536 (02) : L101 - L104
  • [7] PHOTOMETRIC ORBITS OF EXTRASOLAR PLANETS
    Brown, Robert A.
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 702 (02) : 1237 - 1249
  • [8] A grid of polarization models for Rayleigh scattering planetary atmospheres
    Buenzli, E.
    Schmid, H. M.
    [J]. ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS, 2009, 504 (01) : 259 - 276
  • [9] A nongray theory of extrasolar giant planets and brown dwarfs
    Burrows, A
    Marley, M
    Hubbard, WB
    Lunine, JI
    Guillot, T
    Saumon, D
    Freedman, R
    Sudarsky, D
    Sharp, C
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 491 (02) : 856 - 875
  • [10] Spectra and diagnostics for the direct detection of wide-separation extrasolar giant planets
    Burrows, A
    Sudarsky, D
    Hubeny, I
    [J]. ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 609 (01) : 407 - 416