Three-dimensional volume-rendering computed tomography for measuring humeral version

被引:8
作者
Polster, Joshua M. [1 ]
Subhas, Naveen [1 ]
Scalise, Jason J. [2 ]
Bryan, Jason A.
Lieber, Michael L.
Schickendantz, Mark S. [3 ]
机构
[1] Cleveland Clin, Imaging Inst, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[2] CORE Inst, Sun City, AZ USA
[3] Cleveland Clin, Orthoped & Rheumatol Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
关键词
Humerus; retroversion; computed tomography (CT); shoulder; arthroplasty; volume rendering; TOTAL SHOULDER ARTHROPLASTY; PROSTHETIC DESIGN; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; HEAD RETROVERSION; PROXIMAL HUMERUS; GEOMETRY; ANATOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2009.11.047
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Hypothesis: Humeral version is highly variable in human beings. Accurate assessment of humeral version may allow for more anatomic reconstruction at shoulder arthroplasty. Two-dimensional (2D) computed tomography (CT) has been used to measure humeral version but has limitations of poor interobserver reproducibility and strict dependence on arm positioning during image acquisition. This study evaluated a new technique, 3-dimensional (3D) volume rendering, for measuring humeral version. Materials and methods: Eight dried human humerus specimens were included in the study. Gold standard measurements of humeral version were obtained by use of Metallic beads and fluoroscopy. The specimens were then scanned at CT in 2 different positions, 1 neutral to the table and 1 angled at 20 degrees. The image data sets were used to Measure humeral version in each bone with both the standard 2D technique and the new 3D technique. Measurements were performed by 3 readers at 2 different time points. Readers were blinded to the gold standard results and each others measurements. Results: For all readers, 3D measurements averaged within 4.30 degrees of the gold standard. For 2 of the 3 readers, 3D measurements were more accurate than 2D measurements. For all 3 readers, intraobserver variability was better with the 3D technique. For all reader pairs, interobserver variability was better with the 3D technique. Conclusions: This study shows a 3D volume-rendering CT technique to measure humeral version accurately and consistently that is independent of patient positioning. Level of evidence: Basic Science Study. (C) 2010 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees.
引用
收藏
页码:899 / 907
页数:9
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] CT scan method accurately assesses humeral head retroversion
    Boileau, P.
    Bicknell, R. T.
    Mazzoleni, N.
    Watch, G.
    Urien, J. P.
    [J]. CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2008, 466 (03) : 661 - 669
  • [2] The three-dimensional geometry of the proximal humerus - Implications for surgical technique and prosthetic design
    Boileau, P
    Walch, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1997, 79B (05): : 857 - 865
  • [3] A study of reproducibility of an original method of CT measurement of the lateralization of the intertubercular groove and humeral retroversion
    Cassagnaud, X
    Maynou, C
    Petroff, E
    Dujardin, C
    Mestdagh, H
    [J]. SURGICAL AND RADIOLOGIC ANATOMY, 2003, 25 (02) : 145 - 151
  • [4] An anthropometric study of the bilateral anatomy of the humerus
    DeLude, Jennifer A.
    Bicknell, Ryan T.
    MacKenzie, Geoff A.
    Ferreira, Louis M.
    Dunning, Cynthia E.
    King, Graham J. W.
    Johnson, James A.
    Drosdowech, Darren S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2007, 16 (04) : 477 - 483
  • [5] Computed tomography measurement of humeral head retroversion: Influence of patient positioning
    Farrokh, D
    Fabeck, L
    Descamps, PY
    Hardy, D
    Delince, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2001, 10 (06) : 550 - 553
  • [6] FISCHER LP, 1977, REV CHIR ORTHOP, V63, P108
  • [7] Geometry of the proximal humerus and implications for prosthetic design
    Hertel, R
    Knothe, U
    Ballmer, FT
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2002, 11 (04) : 331 - 338
  • [8] Hill J A, 1989, Orthop Rev, V18, P84
  • [9] Pearl M L, 1995, J Shoulder Elbow Surg, V4, P286, DOI 10.1016/S1058-2746(05)80022-9
  • [10] Geometric variables in anatomic replacement of the proximal humerus: How much prosthetic geometry is necessary?
    Pearl, Michaet L.
    Kurutza, Sam
    Postachini, Roberto
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (03) : 366 - 370