Optimal Number of Systematic Biopsy Cores Used in Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Transrectal Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy

被引:1
作者
Teraoka, Shogo [1 ]
Honda, Masashi [1 ]
Shimizu, Ryutaro [1 ]
Nishikawa, Ryoma [1 ]
Kimura, Yusuke [1 ]
Yumioka, Tetsuya [1 ]
Iwamoto, Hideto [1 ]
Morizane, Shuichi [1 ]
Hikita, Katsuya [1 ]
Takenaka, Atsushi [1 ]
机构
[1] Tottori Univ, Fac Med, Sch Med, Div Urol,Dept Surg, Yonago, Tottori 6838503, Japan
关键词
magnetic resonance imaging; prostate; prostatic neoplasms; ultrasonography; Image-guided biopsy; GUIDED IN-BORE; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASOUND; CANCER-DETECTION; PAIN PERCEPTION; 12-CORE; MRI; MORBIDITY; DIAGNOSIS; IMPACT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.33160/yam.2021.08.004
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Background In recent years, the effectiveness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy (MRF-TB) has been widely reported. In this study, we assessed the effect of reduction of the number of systematic biopsy (SB) cores on the cancer detection rate (CDR). Methods Patients with a high prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level underwent prostate MRI. The Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS) was then used to rate the lesions. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) PSA level between 4.0 and 30.0 ng/mL and (2) patients with one or more lesions on MRI and a PI-RADS score of 3 or more. All enrolled patients were SB naive or had a history of one or more prior negative SBs. A total of 104 Japanese met this selection criterion. We have traditionally performed 14-core SB following the MRF-TB. In this study, the CDRs of 10 core SB methods, excluding biopsy results at the center of the base and mid-level on both sides, were compared with those of the conventional biopsy method. Results We compared CDRs of the 14-core and 10 core SBs used in combination. The overall CDR was 55.8% for the former and 55.8% for the latter, thereby indicating that there was no significant difference (P = 1.00) between the two. In addition, the CDRs of csPCa were 51.9% for the former and 51.1% for the latter, which indicated that there was no significant difference (P = 0.317). Conclusion There was no significant difference in the CDR when the number of SB cores to be used in combination was 14 and 10.
引用
收藏
页码:260 / 268
页数:9
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Alvarez-Mugica Miguel, 2007, Arch Esp Urol, V60, P237
[2]   Comparison of patient comfort between MR-guided in-bore and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided prostate biopsies within a prospective randomized trial [J].
Arsov, Christian ;
Rabenalt, Robert ;
Quentin, Michael ;
Hiester, Andreas ;
Blondin, Dirk ;
Albers, Peter ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Schimmoeller, Lars .
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2016, 34 (02) :215-220
[3]   Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-guided In-bore Biopsy to MRI-ultrasound Fusion and Transrectal Ultrasound-guided Prostate Biopsy in Patients with Prior Negative Biopsies [J].
Arsov, Christian ;
Rabenalt, Robert ;
Blondin, Dirk ;
Quentin, Michael ;
Hiester, Andreas ;
Godehardt, Erhard ;
Gabbert, Helmut E. ;
Becker, Nikolaus ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Albers, Peter ;
Schimmoeller, Lars .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2015, 68 (04) :713-720
[4]   A Randomized Controlled Trial To Assess and Compare the Outcomes of Two-core Prostate Biopsy Guided by Fused Magnetic Resonance and Transrectal Ultrasound Images and Traditional 12-core Systematic Biopsy [J].
Baco, Eduard ;
Rud, Erik ;
Eri, Lars Magne ;
Moen, Gunnar ;
Vlatkovic, Ljiljana ;
Svindland, Aud ;
Eggesbo, Heidi B. ;
Ukimura, Osamu .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :149-156
[5]   Complication rate of transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy: A comparison among 3 protocols with 6, 10 and 15 cores [J].
Berger, AP ;
Gozzi, C ;
Steiner, H ;
Frauscher, F ;
Varkarakis, J ;
Rogatsch, H ;
Bartsch, G ;
Horninger, W .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2004, 171 (04) :1478-1480
[6]   Should warfarin or aspirin be stopped prior to prostate biopsy? An analysis of bleeding complications related to increasing sample number regimes [J].
Chowdhury, R. ;
Abbas, A. ;
Idriz, S. ;
Hoy, A. ;
Rutherford, E. E. ;
Smart, J. M. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2012, 67 (12) :E64-E70
[7]   Age: "a natural anesthetic" in pain perception during the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy procedure [J].
Dell'Atti, Lucio ;
Borea, Pier Andrea ;
Russo, Gian Rosario .
UROLOGIA JOURNAL, 2011, 78 (04) :257-261
[8]   Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Prostate Biopsy-Are 2 Biopsy Cores per Magnetic Resonance Imaging Lesion Required? [J].
Dimitroulis, Pantelis ;
Rabenalt, Robert ;
Nini, Alessandro ;
Hiester, Andreas ;
Esposito, Irene ;
Schimmoeller, Lars ;
Antoch, Gerald ;
Albers, Peter ;
Arsov, Christian .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 200 (05) :1030-1034
[9]   Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: The role of systematic and targeted biopsies [J].
Filson, Christopher P. ;
Natarajan, Shyam ;
Margolis, Daniel J. A. ;
Huang, Jiaoti ;
Lieu, Patricia ;
Dorey, Frederick J. ;
Reiter, Robert E. ;
Marks, Leonard S. .
CANCER, 2016, 122 (06) :884-892
[10]   Bleeding after transrectal ultrasonography-guided prostate biopsy: a study of 7-day morbidity after a six-, eight- and 12-core biopsy protocol [J].
Ghani, KR ;
Dundas, D ;
Patel, U .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2004, 94 (07) :1014-1020