Breast cancer risk perceptions of Turkish women attending primary care: a cross-sectional study

被引:14
作者
Kartal, Mehtap [1 ]
Ozcakar, Nilgun [1 ]
Hatipoglu, Sehnaz [2 ]
Tan, Makbule Neslisah
Guldal, Azize Dilek [1 ]
机构
[1] Dokuz Eylul Univ, Dept Family Med, Fac Med, TR-35340 Izmir, Turkey
[2] Minist Hlth, Family Hlth Ctr 24, Izmir, Turkey
关键词
Breast neoplasms; Screening; Prevention; Risk; Perception; FAMILY-HISTORY; PERCEIVED RISK; ABSOLUTE RISK; TASK-FORCE; GAIL MODEL; CHEMOPREVENTION; METAANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE; TURKEY; AGE;
D O I
10.1186/s12905-014-0152-3
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: As the risks and benefits of early detection and primary prevention strategies for breast cancer are beginning to be quantified, the risk perception of women has become increasingly important as may affect their screening behaviors. This study evaluated the women's breast cancer risk perception and their accuracy, and determined the factors that can affect their risk perception accuracy. Methods: Data was collected in a cross-sectional survey design. Questionnaire, including breast cancer risk factors, risk perceptions and screening behaviors, answered by 624 women visiting primary health care center (PHCC). "Perceived risk" investigated with numeric and verbal measures. Accuracy of risk perception was determined by women's Gail 5-year risk scores. Results: The mean age of the participants was 59.62 +/- 1.97 years. Of the women 6.7% had a first-degree relative with breast cancer, 68.9% performed breast self-examination and 62.3% had a mammography, and 82.9% expressed their breast cancer worry as "low". The numeric measure correlated better with worry and Gail scores. Of the women 65.5% perceived their breast cancer risk accurately. Among the women in "high risk" group 65.7% underestimated, while in "average risk" group 25.4% overestimated their risk. Conclusions: Turkish women visiting PHCC are overtly and overly optimistic. This was especially obvious with the result that nearly one third had had no mammography. There is a need for further studies to understand why and how this optimism is maintained so that better screening strategies can be applied at PHCC. All health workers working at PHCC have to be aware of this optimism to prevent missed opportunities for cancer screening.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], BREAST CANC RISK ASS
[2]  
[Anonymous], GLOB 2012 EST CANC I
[3]   Perceived and Objective Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Chilean Women Living in an Underserved Area [J].
Banegas, Matthew P. ;
Pueschel, Klaus ;
Martinez-Gutierrez, Javiera ;
Anderson, Jennifer C. ;
Thompson, Beti .
CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY BIOMARKERS & PREVENTION, 2012, 21 (10) :1716-1721
[4]   PERCEPTIONS OF BREAST-CANCER RISK AND SCREENING EFFECTIVENESS IN WOMEN YOUNGER THAN 50 YEARS OF AGE [J].
BLACK, WC ;
NEASE, RF ;
TOSTESON, ANA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (10) :720-731
[5]   Women's perceptions of breast cancer risk: Are they accurate? [J].
Buxton, JA ;
Bottorff, JL ;
Balneaves, LG ;
Richardson, C ;
McCullum, M ;
Ratner, PA ;
Hack, T .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH-REVUE CANADIENNE DE SANTE PUBLIQUE, 2003, 94 (06) :422-426
[6]  
Çeber E, 2006, CANCER NURS, V29, P244
[7]   Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence [J].
Costantino, JP ;
Gail, MH ;
Pee, D ;
Anderson, S ;
Redmond, CK ;
Benichou, J ;
Wieand, HS .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (18) :1541-1548
[8]   Accuracy of personal breast cancer risk estimation in cancer-free women during primary care visits [J].
Crepeau, Amy Z. ;
Willoughby, Lisa ;
Pinsky, Brett ;
Hinyard, Leslie ;
Shah, Maulik .
WOMEN & HEALTH, 2008, 47 (02) :113-130
[9]   Gail model for prediction of absolute risk of invasive breast cancer: Independent evaluation in the Florence-European Prospective Investigation Into Cancer and Nutrition Cohort [J].
Decarli, Adriano ;
Calza, Stefano ;
Masala, Giovanna ;
Specchia, Claudia ;
Palli, Domenico ;
Gail, Mitchell H. .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (23) :1686-1693
[10]  
Eser S, 2010, ASIAN PAC J CANCER P, V11, P1731