Operative results and learning curve:: microscope-assisted tubular microsurgery for 1-and 2-level discectomies and laminectomies

被引:73
作者
Parikh, Karishma [1 ]
Tomasino, Andre [1 ]
Knopman, Jared [1 ]
Boockvar, John [1 ]
Hartl, Roger [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, Weill Med Coll, Dept Neurol Surg, Presbyterian Hosp, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
laminectomy; microdiscectomy; minimally invasive surgery; spine; tubular retractor;
D O I
10.3171/FOC/2008/25/8/E14
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Object. The authors present their clinical results and the learning curve associated with the use of tubular retractors for 1- and 2-level lumbar microscope-assisted discectomies and laminectomies. Methods. The study involves a retrospective and prospective analysis of 230 patients who underwent noninstrumented minimally invasive procedures for degenerative lumbar spinal disease between 2004 and 2007. Data on patient demographic characteristics and operative results, including length of stay, blood loss, operative times, and surgical complications were collected. Clinical outcomes were assessed based on pre- and postoperative Visual Analog Scale scores, Oswestry Disability Index values, and the Macnab outcome scale scores. Results. The results showed characteristic differences in blood loss and operating times between 1- and 2-level procedures and between discectomies and laminectomies. A significant learning curve was seen by a decrease in operating time for 1-level discectomies and 2-level laminectomies. Major complications were not observed. Conclusions. The use of tubular retractors for microsurgical decompression of degenerative spinal disease is a safe and effective treatment modality. As with other techniques, minimally invasive procedures are associated with a significant learning curve. As surgeons become more comfortable with the procedure, its applications can be expanded to include, for example, spinal instrumentation and deformity correction.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Caspar W., 1977, Advances in neurosurgery, P74
[2]   An assessment of surgery for spinal stenosis: Time trends, geographic variations, complications, and reoperations [J].
Ciol, MA ;
Deyo, RA ;
Howell, E ;
Kreif, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1996, 44 (03) :285-290
[3]   RESULTS OF MICROSURGICAL LUMBAR DISCECTOMY - REVIEW ON 485 PATIENTS [J].
EBELING, U ;
REICHENBERG, W ;
REULEN, HJ .
ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 1986, 81 (1-2) :45-52
[4]  
Foley K T, 1999, Neurosurg Focus, V7, pe5
[5]   Less systemic cytokine response in patients following microendoscopic versus open lumbar discectomy [J].
Huang, TJ ;
Hsu, RWW ;
Li, YY ;
Cheng, CC .
JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 2005, 23 (02) :406-411
[6]   Surgical complications of microendoscopic procedures for lumbar spinal stenosis [J].
Ikuta, K. ;
Tono, O. ;
Tanaka, T. ;
Arima, J. ;
Nakano, S. ;
Sasaki, K. ;
Oga, M. .
MINIMALLY INVASIVE NEUROSURGERY, 2007, 50 (03) :145-149
[7]   Lumbar spinal stenosis. [J].
Katz, Jeffrey N. ;
Harris, Mitchel B. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 358 (08) :818-825
[8]   Microendoscopic decompressive laminotomy for the treatment of lumbar stenosis [J].
Khoo, LT ;
Fessler, RG .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) :S146-S154
[10]   Current concepts in minimally invasive discectomy [J].
Maroon, JC .
NEUROSURGERY, 2002, 51 (05) :S137-S145