Identifying plant species using mid-wave infrared (2.5-6 μm) and thermal infrared (8-14 μm) emissivity spectra

被引:98
作者
Ullah, Saleem [1 ,2 ]
Schlerf, Martin [1 ,3 ]
Skidmore, Andrew K. [1 ]
Hecker, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Twente, Fac Geoinformat Sci & Earth Observat ITC, NL-7500 AE Enschede, Netherlands
[2] Natl Univ Sci & Technol, Inst Geog Informat Syst IGIS, Sect H 12, Islamabad, Pakistan
[3] Ctr Res Publ Gabriel Lippmann CRPGL, L-4422 Belvaux, Luxembourg
关键词
Spectral emissivity; J-M distance; ANOVA; Tukey HSD; Spectral separability; Kirchhoff law; SALT-MARSH VEGETATION; REFLECTANCE; DISCRIMINATION; INDEXES; BIOMASS; SPECTROSCOPY; FORESTS; LEAVES; BAY;
D O I
10.1016/j.rse.2011.11.008
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Plant species discrimination using remote sensing is generally limited by the similarity of their reflectance spectra in the visible, NIR and SWIR domains. Laboratory measured emissivity spectra in the mid infrared (MIR; 2.5 mu m-6 mu m) and the thermal infrared (TIR; 8 mu m-14 mu m) domain of different plant species, however, reveal significant differences. It is anticipated that with the advances in airborne and space borne hyperspectral thermal sensors, differentiation between plant species may improve. The laboratory emissivity spectra of thirteen common broad leaved species, comprising 3024 spectral bands in the MIR and TIR, were analyzed. For each wavelength the differences between the species were tested for significance using the one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the post-hoc Tukey HSD test. The emissivity spectra of the analyzed species were found to be statistically different at various wavebands. Subsequently, six spectral bands were selected (based on the histogram of separable pairs of species for each waveband) to quantify the separability between each species pair based on the Jefferies Matusita GM) distance. Out of 78 combinations, 76 pairs had a significantly different JM distance. This means that careful selection of hyperspectral bands in the MIR and TIR (2.5 mu m-14 mu m) results in reliable species discrimination. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:95 / 102
页数:8
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Spectral discrimination of papyrus vegetation (Cyperus papyrus L.) in swamp wetlands using field spectrometry [J].
Adam, Elhadi ;
Mutanga, Onisimo .
ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2009, 64 (06) :612-620
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1997, PRACTICAL DATA ANAL
[3]   Biophysical and biochemical sources of variability in canopy reflectance [J].
Asner, GP .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1998, 64 (03) :234-253
[4]   Mapping salt-marsh vegetation by multispectral and hyperspectral remote sensing [J].
Belluco, Enrica ;
Camuffo, Monica ;
Ferrari, Sergio ;
Modenese, Lorenza ;
Silvestri, Sonia ;
Marani, Alessandro ;
Marani, Marco .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2006, 105 (01) :54-67
[5]   Retrieval of chlorophyll concentration from leaf reflectance spectra using wavelet analysis [J].
Blackburn, George Alan ;
Ferwerda, Jelle Garke .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2008, 112 (04) :1614-1632
[6]   Improving Discrimination of Savanna Tree Species Through a Multiple-Endmember Spectral Angle Mapper Approach: Canopy-Level Analysis [J].
Cho, Moses Azong ;
Debba, Pravesh ;
Mathieu, Renaud ;
Naidoo, Laven ;
van Aardt, Jan ;
Asner, Gregory P. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2010, 48 (11) :4133-4142
[7]   Derivation of the red edge index using the MERIS standard band setting [J].
Clevers, JGPW ;
De Jong, SM ;
Epema, GF ;
Van der Meer, FD ;
Bakker, WH ;
Skidmore, AK ;
Scholte, KH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2002, 23 (16) :3169-3184
[8]  
COBLENTZ WW, 1913, B BUR STANDARDS, V9, P283
[9]   REMOTE-SENSING OF FOLIAR CHEMISTRY [J].
CURRAN, PJ .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 30 (03) :271-278
[10]   Spectral reflectance and emissivity features of broad leaf plants:: Prospects for remote sensing in the thermal infrared (8.0-14.0 μm) [J].
da Luz, Beatriz Ribeiro ;
Crowley, James K. .
REMOTE SENSING OF ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 109 (04) :393-405