Comparison of China's Biomass Combustion Power Generation with Different Installed Capacities

被引:5
作者
Zhu, Xiaocheng [1 ]
Zhang, Yanru [2 ]
Wang, Zhenzhong [1 ]
Pan, Xunzhang [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Chinese Acad Social Sci, Sch Marxism, Beijing 100732, Peoples R China
[2] Natl Bio Energy Co Ltd, Beijing 100080, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Petr, Sch Econ & Management, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
关键词
biomass; power generation; installed capacity; techno-economic analysis; operating status; TECHNOECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY-PRODUCTION; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; INTERNAL RATE; POLICIES; SCHEMES; PLANT; HEAT;
D O I
10.3390/en15041535
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
As a major technical route to utilize biomass energy, biomass combustion power generation (BCPG) has been shown to be of environmental and economic significance. According to the operating experience, the installed capacity has a decisive impact on the operation and economic return of BCPG projects. In China, an installed capacity of either 30 MW or 12 MW is often chosen for constructing a BCPG project. To explore which one is more suitable for China, this paper uses actual operating data to compare the operation performance and techno-economics of two representative BCPG projects with an installed capacity of 30 MW and 12 MW. The results show that the operation situation and electricity production of the 30 MW project are better than those of the 12 MW project. The 30 MW project has a lower biomass consumption than the 12 MW project to produce per unit of electricity. The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the 30 MW project is greater than the industry benchmark in China and is almost three times the IRR of the 12 MW project. Therefore, it is recommended to construct BCPG projects with installed capacity of 30 MW in China.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Characteristics of biomass in flameless combustion: A review [J].
Abuelnuor, A. A. A. ;
Wahid, M. A. ;
Hosseini, Seyed Ehsan ;
Saat, A. ;
Saqr, Khalid M. ;
Sait, Hani H. ;
Osman, M. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 33 :363-370
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1908, BIOMETRIKA, V6, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, Technical Report
[4]   Technoeconomic assessment and strategic analysis of heat and power co-generation (CHP) from biomass in Greece [J].
Bakos, G. C. ;
Tsioliaridou, E. ;
Potolias, C. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2008, 32 (06) :558-567
[5]   Biomass energy in the world, use of biomass and potential trends [J].
Balat, M ;
Ayar, G .
ENERGY SOURCES, 2005, 27 (10) :931-940
[6]  
Box Joan Fisher, 1987, Stat. Sci, V2, P45, DOI DOI 10.1214/SS/1177013437
[7]   Techno-economic analysis of a biomass gasification power plant dealing with forestry residues blends for electricity production in Portugal [J].
Cardoso, Joao ;
Silva, Valter ;
Eusebio, Daniela .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 212 :741-753
[8]   Life Cycle Assessment and Economic Analysis of Biomass Energy Technology in China: A Brief Review [J].
Chen, Shuangyin ;
Feng, He ;
Zheng, Jun ;
Ye, Jianguo ;
Song, Yi ;
Yang, Haiping ;
Zhou, Ming .
PROCESSES, 2020, 8 (09)
[9]  
CREEI (China Renewable Energy Engineering Institute), 2021, BIOM POW ACH STAT RE
[10]   Feasibility Analysis of Biomass Power Generation in China [J].
Cui, Herui ;
Wu, Ruimei .
2012 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON FUTURE ENERGY, ENVIRONMENT, AND MATERIALS, PT A, 2012, 16 :45-52