Proof-of-the-Concept Study on Mathematically Optimized Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy for Breast Cancer Diagnostics

被引:18
作者
Belkic, Dzevad [1 ]
Belkic, Karen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Karolinska Inst, Dept Oncol Pathol, SE-17176 Stockholm, Sweden
[2] Claremont Grad Univ, Sch Community & Global Hlth, Claremont, CA USA
[3] Univ So Calif, Keck Sch Med, Inst Prevent Res, Alhambra, CA USA
关键词
magnetic resonance spectroscopy; breast cancer diagnostics; mathematical optimization; fast Pade transform; H-1 MR SPECTROSCOPY; EXACT QUANTIFICATION; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; HIGH-RESOLUTION; T; LESIONS; MAMMOGRAPHY; CHOLINE; UTILITY; DIFFERENTIATION;
D O I
10.1177/1533034614547446
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Magnetic resonance (MR)-based modalities aid breast cancer detection without exposure to ionizing radiation. Magnetic resonance imaging is very sensitive but costly and insufficiently specific. Molecular imaging through magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS) can provide information about key metabolites. Here, the measured/encoded time signals cannot be interpreted directly, necessitating mathematics for mapping to the more manageable frequency domain. Conventional applications of MRS are hampered by data analysis via the fast Fourier transform (FFT) and postprocessing by fitting techniques. Most in vivo MRS studies on breast cancer rely upon estimations of total choline (tCHO). These have yielded only incremental improvements in diagnostic accuracy. In vitro studies reveal richer metabolic information for identifying breast cancer, particularly in closely overlapping components of tCHO. Among these are phosphocholine (PC), a marker of malignant transformation of the breast. The FFT cannot assess these congested spectral components. This can be done by the fast Pade transform (FPT), a high-resolution, quantification-equipped method, which we presently apply to noisy MRS time signals consistent with those encoded in breast cancer. The FPT unequivocally and robustly extracted the concentrations of all physical metabolites, including PC. In sharp contrast, the FFT produced a rough envelope spectrum with a few distorted peaks and key metabolites absent altogether. As such, the FFT has poor resolution for these typical MRS time signals from breast cancer. Hence, based on Fourier-estimated envelope spectra, tCHO estimates are unreliable. Using even truncated time signals, the FPT clearly distinguishes noise from true metabolites whose concentrations are accurately extracted. The high resolution of the FPT translates directly into shortened examination time of the patient. These capabilities strongly suggest that by applying the FPT to time signals encoded in vivo from the breast, MRS will, at last, fulfill its potential to become a clinically reliable, cost-effective method for breast cancer detection, including screening/surveillance.
引用
收藏
页码:277 / 297
页数:21
相关论文
共 51 条
[41]   Multicenter Surveillance of Women at High Genetic Breast Cancer Risk Using Mammography, Ultrasonography, and Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging (the High Breast Cancer Risk Italian 1 Study) Final Results [J].
Sardanelli, Francesco ;
Podo, Franca ;
Santoro, Filippo ;
Manoukian, Siranoush ;
Bergonzi, Silvana ;
Trecate, Giovanna ;
Vergnaghi, Daniele ;
Federico, Massimo ;
Cortesi, Laura ;
Corcione, Stefano ;
Morassut, Sandro ;
Di Maggio, Cosimo ;
Cilotti, Anna ;
Martincich, Laura ;
Calabrese, Massimo ;
Zuiani, Chiara ;
Preda, Lorenzo ;
Bonanni, Bernardo ;
Carbonaro, Luca A. ;
Contegiacomo, Alma ;
Panizza, Pietro ;
Di Cesare, Ernesto ;
Savarese, Antonella ;
Crecco, Marcello ;
Turchetti, Daniela ;
Tonutti, Maura ;
Belli, Paolo ;
Del Maschio, Alessandro .
INVESTIGATIVE RADIOLOGY, 2011, 46 (02) :94-105
[42]   American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography [J].
Saslow, Debbie ;
Boetes, Carla ;
Burke, Wylie ;
Harms, Steven ;
Leach, Martin O. ;
Lehman, Constance D. ;
Morris, Elizabeth ;
Pisano, Etta ;
Schnall, Mitchell ;
Sener, Stephen ;
Smith, Robert A. ;
Warner, Ellen ;
Yaffe, Martin ;
Andrews, Kimberly S. ;
Russell, Christy A. .
CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (02) :75-89
[43]   Mammographic, US, and MR imaging phenotypes of familial breast cancer [J].
Schrading, Simone ;
Kuhl, Christiane K. .
RADIOLOGY, 2008, 246 (01) :58-70
[44]   Association of diagnostic work-up with subsequent attendance in a breast cancer screening program for false-positive cases [J].
Seigneurin, Arnaud ;
Exbrayat, C. ;
Labarere, J. ;
Delafosse, P. ;
Poncet, F. ;
Colonna, M. .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2011, 127 (01) :221-228
[45]   Role of apparent diffusion coefficient values for the differentiation of viable and necrotic areas of breast cancer and its potential utility to vide voxel positioning for MRS in the absence of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data [J].
Sharma, Uma ;
Sah, Rani G. ;
Parshad, Rajinder ;
Sharma, Raju ;
Seenu, Vurthaluru ;
Jagannathana, Naranamangalam R. .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2012, 30 (05) :649-655
[46]   In vivo proton MR spectroscopy of the breast [J].
Stanwell, Peter ;
Mountford, Carolyn .
RADIOGRAPHICS, 2007, 27 :S253-S266
[47]   Quantitative analysis of prostate metabolites using 1H HR-MAS spectroscopy [J].
Swanson, MG ;
Zektzer, AS ;
Tabatabai, ZL ;
Simko, J ;
Jarso, S ;
Keshari, KR ;
Schmitt, L ;
Carroll, PR ;
Shinohara, K ;
Vigneron, DB ;
Kurhanewicz, J .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IN MEDICINE, 2006, 55 (06) :1257-1264
[48]   1H MR Spectroscopy and Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Breast: Are They Useful Tools for Characterizing Breast Lesions Before Biopsy? [J].
Tozaki, Mitsuhiro ;
Fukuma, Eisuke .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2009, 193 (03) :840-849
[49]   Role of magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging before and after radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Westphalen, Antonio C. ;
Mckenna, David A. ;
Kurhanewicz, John ;
Coakley, Fergus V. .
JOURNAL OF ENDOUROLOGY, 2008, 22 (04) :789-794
[50]   Utility of Breast MRI for Evaluation of Residual Disease Following Excisional Biopsy [J].
Wilkinson, Jared ;
Appleton, Catherine M. ;
Margenthaler, Julie A. .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2011, 170 (02) :233-239