Novel robotic technology for the rapid intraoperative manufacture of patient-specific instrumentation allowing for improved glenoid component accuracy in shoulder arthroplasty: a cadaveric study

Background: Accurate prosthesis placement in arthroplasty is an important factor in the long-term success of these interventions. Many types of guidance technology have been described to date often suffering from high costs, complex theater integration, time inefficiency, and problems with day-to-day usability. We present a novel, intraoperative robotics platform, capable of rapid, real-time manufacture of low-cost patient-specific guides while overcoming many of the issues with existing approaches. Methods: A prototype robotics platform was assessed in a 24-specimen cadaveric trial during sequential simulated shoulder arthroplasty procedures. The platform consisted of a tableside robot with sterile drapes and sterile disposable components. The robot itself comprised a 3D optical scanner, a 3-axis sterile robotic drill, and a 2-axis receptacle into which the disposable consumables were inserted. The consumable was composed of a region of rapidly setting moldable material and a clip allowing it to be reversibly attached to the robot. Computed tomographic (CT) imaging was obtained for all cadaveric specimens, and a surgical plan was created focusing on glenoid component positiondspecifically, guidewire position to allow for accurate glenoid preparation before implant insertion. Intraoperatively, for every specimen, the relevant osseous anatomy was exposed and humeral and glenoid preparation undertaken in the usual manner. The sterile disposable was used to create a mold of the joint surface. Once set, the mold was inserted into the robot and an optical scan of the surface was undertaken followed by automatic surface registration with the CT data and surgical plan. An automatic guide hole was subsequently drilled into the molded blank, which was removed from the robot and placed back into the patient, with the melded surface ensuring exact replacement. The guidewire was then driven through the guide hole in accordance with the preoperative plan. Results: The novel robotic platform achieved average angular accuracies of 1.9 degrees (standard deviation [SD] 1.3) version and 1.2 degrees (SD 0.7) inclination with positional accuracy of 1.1 mm (SD 0.7) compared to a preoperative plan. Discussion: We have described a novel robotics platform that is able to reliably produce patient-specific intraoperative guides to allow for accurate guidewire placement. Guidance is provided using a portable intraoperative device. The results suggest achieved accuracy levels may be equivalent to those seen in other existing guidance technologies; however, eventual in vivo trials and analysis is required. This technology has potential transferability to improve accuracy in other areas of arthroplasty. (C) 2021 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees. All rights reserved.