Power markets in transition: Decarbonization, energy efficiency, and short-term demand response

被引:45
作者
Mier, Mathias [1 ]
Weissbart, Christoph [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Munich, Inst Econ Res, Poschingerstr 5, D-81679 Munich, Germany
关键词
Energy efficiency; Demand response; Renewable energy; Dispatchable technologies; Energy modeling; Optimal dispatch; Investment planning; SOCIAL COST; RENEWABLE ENERGY; SIDE MANAGEMENT; TEMPORAL PRICE; CONSUMPTION; GAP;
D O I
10.1016/j.eneco.2019.104644
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Energy efficiency and short-term demand response are key issues in the decarbonization of power markets. However, their interaction and combined impact on market prices as well as on the supply side, is yet to be understood. We develop a framework to implement short-term demand response and investments in energy efficiency in detailed partial equilibrium power market models. We quantify our results using the EU-REGEN model for the European power market. Under an 80% emission reduction target, energy efficiency contributes only 11% of carbon emission reductions. Intermittent renewable energies such as wind and solar power account for the major share of 53%. In comparison to a scenario without short-term demand response and energy efficiency investments, 70 GW gas power is decommissioned immediately and 180 GW less gas capacity is needed in 2050, which underlines the need for immediate action by policy makers to avoid locking the EU power market into an inefficient path. (C) 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Cross-country electricity trade, renewable energy and European transmission infrastructure policy [J].
Abrell, Jan ;
Rausch, Sebastian .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2016, 79 :87-113
[2]   The Environment and Directed Technical Change [J].
Acemoglu, Daron ;
Aghion, Philippe ;
Bursztyn, Leonardo ;
Hemous, David .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2012, 102 (01) :131-166
[3]  
Allcott H., 2017, MEASURING WELFARE EF
[4]   Carbon emission intensity in electricity production: A global analysis [J].
Ang, B. W. ;
Su, Bin .
ENERGY POLICY, 2016, 94 :56-63
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2017, TECHNICAL REPORT
[6]   The uncertainty about the social cost of carbon: A decomposition analysis using fund [J].
Anthoff, David ;
Tol, Richard S. J. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2013, 117 (03) :515-530
[7]   Modelling of electricity savings in the Danish households sector: from the energy system to the end-user [J].
Baldini, Mattia ;
Trivella, Alessio .
ENERGY EFFICIENCY, 2018, 11 (07) :1563-1581
[8]  
Blanford G., 2014, Energy J., V35, P137
[9]   Green promotes the dirtiest: on the interaction between black and green quotas in energy markets [J].
Boehringer, Christoph ;
Rosendahl, Knut Einar .
JOURNAL OF REGULATORY ECONOMICS, 2010, 37 (03) :316-325
[10]   A Microeconomic Framework for Evaluating Energy Efficiency Rebound and Some Implications [J].
Borenstein, Severin .
ENERGY JOURNAL, 2015, 36 (01) :1-21