Robust multi-objective optimization for water distribution system design using a meta-metaheuristic

被引:36
作者
Raad, Darian [1 ]
Sinske, Alexander [2 ]
van Vuuren, Jan [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stellenbosch, Dept Logist, ZA-7602 Matieland, South Africa
[2] GLS Software Pty Ltd, ZA-7599 Stellenbosch, South Africa
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
multi-objective optimization; water distribution systems; meta-metaheuristic; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; DISTRIBUTION NETWORK; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; OPTIMAL LAYOUT; SEARCH; COST; PARADIGM; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-3995.2009.00705.x
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
The design of an urban water distribution system (WDS) is a challenging problem involving multiple objectives. The goal of robust multi-objective optimization for WDS design is to find the set of solutions which embodies an acceptable trade-off between system cost and reliability, so that the ideal solution may be selected for a given budget. In addition to satisfying consumer needs, a system must be built to accommodate multiple demand loading conditions, withstand component failures and allow surplus capacity for growth. In a developmental setting, WDS robustness becomes even more crucial, owing to the limited availability of resources, especially for maintenance. Recent optimization studies have achieved success using multi-objective evolutionary algorithms, such as the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II). However, the multi-objective design of a large WDS within a reasonable timeframe remains a formidable problem, owing to the extremely high computational complexity of the problem. In this paper, a meta-algorithm called AMALGAM is applied for the first time to WDS design. AMALGAM uses multiple metaheuristics simultaneously in an attempt to improve optimization performance. Additionally, a Jumping-gene Genetic Algorithm (NSGA-II-JG) is also applied for the first time to WDS design. These two algorithms were tested against some other metaheuristics (including NSGA-II and a new greedy algorithm) with respect to a number of benchmark systems documented in the literature, and AMALGAM demonstrated the best performance overall, while NSGA-II-JG fared worse than the ordinary NSGA-II. Large cost savings and reliability improvements are demonstrated for a real WDS developmental case study in South Africa.
引用
收藏
页码:595 / 626
页数:32
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   Simultaneous Layout and Size Optimization of Water Distribution Networks: Engineering Approach [J].
Afshar, M. H. ;
Akbari, M. ;
Marino, M. A. .
JOURNAL OF INFRASTRUCTURE SYSTEMS, 2005, 11 (04) :221-230
[2]   A parameter-free self-adapting boundary genetic search for pipe network optimization [J].
Afshar, M. H. ;
Marino, M. A. .
COMPUTATIONAL OPTIMIZATION AND APPLICATIONS, 2007, 37 (01) :83-102
[3]   DESIGN OF OPTIMAL WATER DISTRIBUTION-SYSTEMS [J].
ALPEROVITS, E ;
SHAMIR, U .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1977, 13 (06) :885-900
[4]  
[Anonymous], HDB EVOLUTIONARY COM
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2004, OPERATIONS RES APPL
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, 1995 IEEE INT C
[7]   Alternative decision making in water distribution network with NSGA-II [J].
Atiquzzaman, M ;
Liong, SY ;
Yu, XY .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2006, 132 (02) :122-126
[8]   A jumping gene paradigm for evolutionary multiobjective optimization [J].
Chan, T. M. ;
Man, K. F. ;
Kwong, S. ;
Tang, K. S. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON EVOLUTIONARY COMPUTATION, 2008, 12 (02) :143-159
[9]  
Chiplunkar A.V., 1986, J ENVIRON ENG, V112, P265
[10]  
Coello C. A. C., 2004, Applications of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms, V1