Prosocial Values and Performance Management Theory: Linking Perceived Social Impact and Performance Information Use

被引:99
作者
Moynihan, Donald P. [1 ]
Pandey, Sanjay K. [2 ]
Wright, Bradley E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin Madison, La Follette Sch, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[2] Rutgers Univ Newark, Newark, NJ USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
来源
GOVERNANCE-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF POLICY ADMINISTRATION AND INSTITUTIONS | 2012年 / 25卷 / 03期
关键词
PUBLIC-SERVICE MOTIVATION; PERSISTENCE; INCENTIVES; GOVERNMENT; WELFARE; REFORM;
D O I
10.1111/j.1468-0491.2012.01583.x
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
Performance management techniques are presented as control mechanisms to save money and hold bureaucrats accountable, consistent with negative agency theory assumptions of bureaucrats. We propose an alternative theory of performance management that rests on prosocial values. This theory argues that public servants who see the social impact of their work are more likely to use performance metrics. We operationalize performance information use in terms of purposeful use for internal organizational means, and political use for external legitimation. Those who perceive that their work has a strong social impact are likely to pursue both types of uses, to improve both the effectiveness of their services, and to maintain resources. The data come from a cross-sectional survey of U.S. public and nonprofit employees.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 483
页数:21
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]   ORGANIZATIONAL INTERDEPENDENCE AND INTRA-ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE [J].
AIKEN, M ;
HAGE, J .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1968, 33 (06) :912-930
[2]  
[Anonymous], MOTIVATION PUBLIC MA
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, POLITICS REGULATION
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1997, POSTMATERIALIST VALU
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, MOTIVATION PUBLIC MA
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2011, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, DOI DOI 10.1093/jopart/muq059
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2001, PRES MAN AG
[8]  
[Anonymous], PRES BUDG FISC YEAR
[9]  
Barzelay M., 2001, NEW PUBLIC MANAGEMEN
[10]   Goal displacement: Assessing the motivation for organizational cheating [J].
Bohte, J ;
Meier, KJ .
PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2000, 60 (02) :173-182