Defining adherence to therapeutic exercise for musculoskeletal pain: a systematic review

被引:86
作者
Bailey, Daniel L. [1 ]
Holden, Melanie A. [1 ]
Foster, Nadine E. [1 ]
Quicke, Jonathan G. [1 ]
Haywood, Kirstie L. [2 ]
Bishop, Annette [1 ]
机构
[1] Keele Univ, Res Inst Primary Care & Hlth Sci, Keele ST5 5BG, Staffs, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Res Nursing, Warwick Med Sch, Coventry, W Midlands, England
关键词
MANAGEMENT; PROGRAM; KNEE; RECOMMENDATIONS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; METAANALYSIS; HIP;
D O I
10.1136/bjsports-2017-098742
中图分类号
G8 [体育];
学科分类号
04 ; 0403 ;
摘要
Objective To establish the meaning of the term 'adherence' (including conceptual and measurement definitions) in the context of therapeutic exercise (TE) for musculoskeletal (MSK) pain. Design Systematic review using a search strategy including terms for: adherence, TE and MSK pain. Identified studies were independently screened for inclusion by two researchers. Two independent researchers extracted data on: study type; MSK pain population; type of TE used; definitions, parameters, measurement methods and values of adherence. Data sources Seven electronic databases were searched from inception to December 2016. Eligibility criteria Any study type featuring TE for adults with MSK pain and containing a definition of adherence, or a description of how adherence was measured. Results 459 studies were identified and 86 were included in the review. Most were prospective cohort studies and featured back and/or neck pain. Strengthening and stretching were the most common types of TE. A clearly identifiable definition of adherence was provided in 40% of the studies, with 12% using the same definition. Exercise frequency was the most commonly measured parameter of adherence, with self-report logs the most common measurement method. The most common value range used to determine satisfactory adherence was 80%-99% of the recommended exercise dose. Conclusion No single definition of adherence to TE was apparent. We found no definition of adherence that specifically related to TE for MSK pain or described the dimensions of TE that should be measured. We recommend conceptualising adherence to TE for MSK pain from the perspective of all relevant stakeholders.
引用
收藏
页码:326 / +
页数:7
相关论文
共 44 条
[31]  
Sackett D.L., 1976, COMPLIANCE THERAPEUT
[32]   Adherence to and efficacy of home exercise programs to prevent falls: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of exercise program characteristics [J].
Simek, Emily M. ;
McPhate, Lucy ;
Haines, Terry P. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2012, 55 (04) :262-275
[33]   A meta-analysis of the association between adherence to drug therapy and mortality [J].
Simpson, Scot H. ;
Eurich, Dean T. ;
Majumdar, Sumit R. ;
Padwal, Rajdeep S. ;
Tsuyuki, Ross T. ;
Varney, Janice ;
Johnson, Jeffrey A. .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2006, 333 (7557) :15-18
[34]  
Smith Jo, 2005, Physiotherapy Theory and Practice, V21, P93, DOI 10.1080/09593980590922316
[35]   Patient and Public Involvement in Patient-Reported Outcome Measures Evolution Not Revolution [J].
Staniszewska, Sophie ;
Haywood, Kirstie L. ;
Brett, Jo ;
Tutton, Liz .
PATIENT-PATIENT CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH, 2012, 5 (02) :79-87
[36]   Cost-utility of exercise therapy in patients with hip osteoarthritis in primary care [J].
Tan, S. S. ;
Teirlinck, C. H. ;
Dekker, J. ;
Goossens, L. M. A. ;
Bohnen, A. M. ;
Verhaar, J. A. N. ;
van Es, P. P. ;
Koes, B. W. ;
Bierma-Zeinstra, S. M. A. ;
Luijsterburg, P. A. J. ;
Koopmanschap, M. A. .
OSTEOARTHRITIS AND CARTILAGE, 2016, 24 (04) :581-588
[37]  
The British Pain Society, 2017, GUID PAIN MAN PROGR
[38]  
UK BEAM Trial Team, 2004, BMJ, V2004
[39]  
US Food and Drug Administration, 2009, Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labeling claims
[40]   Effects of exercise adherence on physical function among overweight older adults with knee osteoarthritis [J].
van Gool, CH ;
Penninx, BWJH ;
Kempen, GIJM ;
Rejeski, WJ ;
Miller, GD ;
van Eijk, JTM ;
Pahor, M ;
Messier, SP .
ARTHRITIS & RHEUMATISM-ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH, 2005, 53 (01) :24-32