Fiscal forecast manipulations and electoral results: evidence from Portuguese municipalities

被引:0
作者
Boukari, Mamadou [1 ]
Veiga, Francisco Jose [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Kara, Kara, Togo
[2] Univ Minho, Braga, Portugal
来源
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC FINANCE AND PUBLIC CHOICE | 2021年 / 36卷 / 02期
关键词
budget forecast errors; elections; municipalities; Portugal; POLITICAL BUSINESS CYCLES; REVENUE FORECASTS; BUDGET CYCLES;
D O I
10.1332/251569120X16055408993874
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article aims to evaluate the impact of budget forecast manipulations on election results using a sample that covers all 308 Portuguese municipalities over the period running from 1998 to 2017. The results reveal that incumbent mayors overestimate revenues and expenditures. Overstating the budget more on the revenue side, they end up with a deficit. We check if this opportunistic behaviour is electorally beneficial. The results provide little or no evidence that election-year manipulations of revenue forecasts affect the vote shares of the party of the incumbent mayor. On the other hand, the opportunistic management of total and capital expenditure forecasts pays off, which is consistent with previous results for Portugal indicating that increased total and, mainly, capital expenditures lead to higher vote shares.
引用
收藏
页码:115 / 138
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Who should you vote for? Empirical evidence from Portuguese local governments [J].
Gabriel, Ricardo Duque .
PORTUGUESE ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 2020, 19 (01) :5-31
[42]   Who should you vote for? Empirical evidence from Portuguese local governments [J].
Ricardo Duque Gabriel .
Portuguese Economic Journal, 2020, 19 :5-31
[43]   Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments [J].
Ferraz, Claudio ;
Finan, Frederico .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2011, 101 (04) :1274-1311
[44]   The electoral effect of pork barrel politics: evidence from England [J].
Lattmann, Johannes .
PUBLIC CHOICE, 2024, 201 (1-2) :199-235
[45]   Electoral cycles in MPs' salaries: evidence from the German states [J].
Kauder, Bjoern ;
Krause, Manuela ;
Potrafke, Niklas .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2018, 25 (04) :981-1000
[46]   Electoral Manipulation and Regime Support Survey Evidence from Russia [J].
Reuter, Ora John ;
Szakonyi, David .
WORLD POLITICS, 2021, 73 (02) :275-314
[47]   Electoral clientelism as status affirmation in Africa: evidence from Ghana [J].
Gadjanova, Elena .
JOURNAL OF MODERN AFRICAN STUDIES, 2017, 55 (04) :593-621
[48]   Creative accounting and electoral motives: Evidence from OECD countries [J].
Reischmann, Markus .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE ECONOMICS, 2016, 44 (02) :243-257
[49]   The Supreme Court as an electoral issue: evidence from three studies [J].
Badas, Alex ;
Simas, Elizabeth .
POLITICAL SCIENCE RESEARCH AND METHODS, 2022, 10 (01) :49-67
[50]   Partisanship and Electoral Accountability: Evidence from the UK Expenses Scandal [J].
Eggers, Andrew C. .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2014, 9 (04) :441-472