Conversation Therapy with People with Aphasia and Conversation Partners using Video Feedback: A Group and Case Series Investigation of Changes in Interaction

被引:39
作者
Best, Wendy [1 ]
Maxim, Jane [1 ]
Heilemann, Claudia [1 ]
Beckley, Firle [1 ]
Johnson, Fiona [2 ]
Edwards, Susan I. [1 ,3 ]
Howard, David [4 ]
Beeke, Suzanne [1 ]
机构
[1] UCL, Div Psychol & Language Sci, Dept Language & Cognit, London, England
[2] Homerton Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] Univ Reading, Psychol & Clin Language Sci, Reading, Berks, England
[4] Newcastle Univ, Sch Educ Commun & Language Sci, Speech & Language Sci, Newcastle Upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, England
基金
英国经济与社会研究理事会;
关键词
aphasia; conversation; intervention; video feedback; agrammatic aphasia; therapy; outcome measure; SIGNIFICANT OTHERS; STROKE; REHABILITATION; COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTION; AGRAMMATISM; INFORMATION; PROVIDE; COUPLES; SPEECH;
D O I
10.3389/fnhum.2076.00562
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Conversation therapies employing video for feedback and to facilitate outcome measurement are increasingly used with people with post-stroke aphasia and their conversation partners; however the evidence base for change in everyday interaction remains limited. We investigated the effect of Better Conversations with Aphasia (BCA), an intervention that is freely available online at https://extend.ucl.ac.uk/. Eight people with chronic agrammatic aphasia, and their regular conversation partners participated in the tailored 8 week program involving significant video feedback. We explored changes in: (i) conversation facilitators (such as multi-modal turns by people with aphasia); and (ii) conversation barriers (such as use of test questions by conversation partners). The outcome of intervention was evaluated directly by measuring change in video-recorded everyday conversations. The study employed a pre-post design with multiple 5 minute samples of conversation before and after intervention, scored by trained raters blind to the point of data collection. Group level analysis showed no significant increase in conversation facilitators. There was, however, a significant reduction in the number of conversation barriers. The case series data revealed variability in conversation behaviors across occasions for the same dyad and between different dyads. Specifically, post-intervention there was a significant increase in facilitator behaviors for two dyads, a decrease for one and no significant change for five dyads. There was a significant decrease in barrier behaviors for five dyads and no significant change for three dyads. The reduction in barrier behaviors was considerable; on average change from over eight to fewer than three barrier behaviors in 5 minutes of conversation. The pre-post design has the limitation of no comparison group. However, change occurs in targeted conversational behaviors and in people with chronic aphasia and their partners. The findings suggest change can occur after eight therapy sessions and have implications for clinical practice. A reduction in barrier behaviors may be easier to obtain, although the controlled case series results demonstrate a significant increase in conversation facilitators is also possible. The rehabilitation tool is available online and video technology was central to delivering intervention and evaluating change.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Comprehensive aphasia test
[2]  
[Anonymous], ARCH PHYS MED REHABI, DOI [10.1016/j.apmr.2014.07.065, DOI 10.1016/J.APMR.2014.07.065]
[3]   Word order and finiteness in Dutch and English Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia [J].
Bastiaanse, R ;
Edwards, S .
BRAIN AND LANGUAGE, 2004, 89 (01) :91-107
[4]  
Bastiaanse R., 2002, VERB SENTENCE TEST
[5]   Delivering communication strategy training for people with aphasia: what is current clinical practice? [J].
Beckley, Firle ;
Best, Wendy ;
Beeke, Suzanne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2017, 52 (02) :197-213
[6]   Conversation therapy for agrammatism: exploring the therapeutic process of engagement and learning by a person with aphasia [J].
Beckley, Firle ;
Best, Wendy ;
Johnson, Fiona ;
Edwards, Susan ;
Maxim, Jane ;
Beeke, Suzanne .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2013, 48 (02) :220-239
[7]   Exploring aphasic grammar 2: do language testing and conversation tell a similar story? [J].
Beeke, S ;
Wilkinson, R ;
Maxim, J .
CLINICAL LINGUISTICS & PHONETICS, 2003, 17 (02) :109-134
[8]  
Beeke S., 2012, COGNITIVE PRAGMATICS, P345, DOI DOI 10.1515/9783110214215.345
[9]  
Beeke S., 2013, Better conversations with aphasia: An e-learning resource
[10]   Individual variation in agrammatism: A single case study of the influence of interaction [J].
Beeke, Suzanne ;
Wilkinson, Ray ;
Maxim, Jane .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2007, 42 (06) :629-647