Simulation and assessment of underwater gas release and dispersion from subsea gas pipelines leak

被引:93
作者
Li, Xinhong [1 ]
Chen, Guoming [1 ]
Zhang, Renren [1 ]
Zhu, Hongwei [1 ]
Fu, Jianmin [1 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr East China, COEST, 66 Changjiang West Rd, Qingdao, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
CFD simulation; Risk assessment; Underwater gas release; Dispersion; Subsea pipelines; DEEP-WATER OIL; BUBBLE PLUMES; MODEL; IMPACT; TRANSPORT; BLOWOUTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.psep.2018.07.015
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Subsea gas release and dispersion can cause safety concerns such as fire, explosion or stability loss of floating installations. This paper presents a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) based approach to describe the behavior of underwater gas release and dispersion from subsea gas pipelines leak. The uniqueness of the present study is the integration of estimating subsea gas release rate and predicting rising gas plume. The proposed approach is comprised of two submodels. An equivalent short pipeline model is established to calculate the subsea gas release rate, considering the change of hole size and environmental pressure. A 3D model based on Eulerian-Lagrangian modeling concept is built to predict the rising gas plume, in which bubbles are treated as discrete particles. The validation is carried out by comparing CFD results against experimental data. The underwater gas dispersion simulations include a matrix of scenarios for different gas release rates, water depths, ocean current speeds and leak positions, to study their effects on the behavior of underwater gas plume. The developed CFD model can provide some valuable outputs, e.g., gas release rate, rise time, horizontal dispersion distance and surfacing area size. These results could help to conduct the risk assessment and the emergency planning for accidental leakage of subsea gas pipelines. (C) 2018 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:46 / 57
页数:12
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2011, Ansys Fluent Theory Guide
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
Bakli M, 2014, EVALUATION GAS OIL D
[4]   Computational fluid dynamic simulation of small leaks in water pipelines for direct leak pressure transduction [J].
Ben-Mansour, R. ;
Habib, M. A. ;
Khalifa, A. ;
Youcef-Toumi, K. ;
Chatzigeorgiou, D. .
COMPUTERS & FLUIDS, 2012, 57 :110-123
[5]   Numerical modeling of large-scale bubble plumes accounting for mass transfer effects [J].
Buscaglia, GC ;
Bombardelli, FA ;
García, MH .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MULTIPHASE FLOW, 2002, 28 (11) :1763-1785
[6]  
Calderbank P.M., 1958, CHEM ENG RES DES, V36, P443
[7]   A model for simulating deepwater oil and gas blowouts - Part II: Comparison of numerical simulations with "deepspill" field experiments [J].
Chen, FH ;
Yapa, PD .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC RESEARCH, 2003, 41 (04) :353-365
[8]   CFD modeling of plume and free surface behavior resulting from a sub-sea gas release [J].
Cloete, Schalk ;
Olsen, Jan Erik ;
Skjetne, Paal .
APPLIED OCEAN RESEARCH, 2009, 31 (03) :220-225
[9]  
Crowl D. A., 2001, Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications
[10]   Correlations for estimating natural gas leakage from above-ground and buried urban distribution pipelines [J].
Ebrahimi-Moghadam, A. ;
Farzaneh-Gord, M. ;
Deymi-Dashtebayaz, M. .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2016, 34 :185-196