Design for structural and energy performance of long span buildings using geometric multi-objective optimization

被引:82
作者
Brown, Nathan C. [1 ]
Mueller, Caitlin T. [1 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Bldg Technol Program, Dept Architecture, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
关键词
Multi-objective optimization; Conceptual design; Embodied energy; Operational energy; Design tradeoffs; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; SIMULATION; EFFICIENCY; SHAPE;
D O I
10.1016/j.enbuild.2016.05.090
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This paper addresses the potential of multi-objective optimization (MOO) in conceptual design to help designers generate and select solutions from a geometrically diverse range of high-performing building forms. With a focus on the long span building typology, this research employs a MOO approach that uses both finite element structural modeling and building energy simulations simultaneously to generate optimized building shapes that are not constrained to regular, rectilinear geometric configurations. Through a series of case studies that explore performance tradeoffs of enclosed arches and static overhangs in different climates, this paper shows how MOO can yield architecturally expressive, high-performing designs, which makes the process more attractive to designers searching for creative forms. It also provides new insight into specific design responses to various climatic constraints, since optimization that considers both structure and energy can shift best solutions in unexpected ways. Finally, by displaying performance results in terms of embodied and operational energy, this paper presents new data showing how considerations of structural material efficiency compare in magnitude to total building energy usage. Together, these three contributions can influence current sustainable design strategies for building typologies that have significant structural requirements. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:748 / 761
页数:14
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
ACADIA Call for Submissions, 2015, COMPUTATIONAL ECOLOG
[2]   MDO: assessment and direction for advancement-an opinion of one international group [J].
Agte, Jeremy ;
de Weck, Olivier ;
Sobieszczanski-Sobieski, Jaroslaw ;
Arendsen, Paul ;
Morris, Alan ;
Spieck, Martin .
STRUCTURAL AND MULTIDISCIPLINARY OPTIMIZATION, 2010, 40 (1-6) :17-33
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, ARCH DAILY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2010, INVENTORY CARBON ENE
[5]  
[Anonymous], BUILD ENV
[6]  
ASHRAE, 2013, ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 62.1-2013
[7]  
ASHRAE, 2004, ANSI/ASHRAE/IESNA Standard 90.1-2004
[8]  
Asl MR, 2014, FUSION: DATA INTEGRATION AT ITS BEST, VOL 2, P455
[9]   A multi-objective feedback approach for evaluating sequential conceptual building design decisions [J].
Basbagill, John P. ;
Flager, Forest L. ;
Lepech, Michael .
AUTOMATION IN CONSTRUCTION, 2014, 45 :136-150
[10]  
Bayer C., 2010, AIA Guide to Building Life Cycle Assessment in Practice