The causes of risk in fuel supply chains and their role in energy security

被引:25
作者
Axon, C. J. [1 ]
Darton, R. C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Brunel Univ London, Inst Energy Futures, London UB8 3PH, England
[2] Univ Oxford, Dept Engn Sci, Oxford OX1 3PJ, England
关键词
Energy system; Risk matrix; Risk register; Scale of risk; Supply chain risk; Systemic risk; RENEWABLE ENERGY; FOSSIL-FUELS; POLICY; SUSTAINABILITY; SYSTEMS; FUTURE; AVAILABILITY; UNCERTAINTY; PERCEPTIONS; GENERATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.129254
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Managing risk is of central importance in achieving energy security, yet a methodology for identifying and assessing all relevant risks has previously been lacking. From an extensive review of risk and the operation of fuel supply chains, 34 distinct generic causes of risk have been recognised. These risks were analysed for the UK's energy system, considered as 19 fuel supply chains (each with six stages), and scored by likelihood and impact on the supply chain (accounting for resilience). A risk matrix was constructed recording the risks encountered at each stage for each fuel. For the UK, the three causes with the greatest total score were 'lack of access to capital', 'changing policy or regulatory framework' and 'significant public concern', all of which were amongst the eight causes of risk noted as most significant at an expert verification workshop. This methodology yields a credible and direct quantification of risk for a national energy system - an indicator of energy security. It does not require the assignment of weighting factors to various contributory characteristics, often arbitrarily chosen in other approaches. It is suggested that the seven most prevalent causes of risk, that occur for nearly all fuels and all stages, may be systemic in nature. The method offers sufficient flexibility to make it readily applicable to other nations, regions, or sites, and other types of supply chain.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 81 条
  • [1] Assessing the European Union's engagement with transnational policy networks on conflict-prone natural resources
    Alorse, Raynold Wonder
    Compaore, W. R. Nadege
    Grant, J. Andrew
    [J]. CONTEMPORARY POLITICS, 2015, 21 (03) : 245 - 257
  • [2] Integrating uncertainty into public energy research and development decisions
    Anadon, Laura Diaz
    Baker, Erin
    Bosetti, Valentina
    [J]. NATURE ENERGY, 2017, 2 (05):
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2019, COMPUT FRAUD SECUR, P4
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2011, Discount rates for low-carbon and renewable generation technologies
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2008, PRACTICAL PHYS
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2018, Worldwide Governance Indicators
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, NAT RISK REG CIV EM
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2014, ENERGY SUPPLY SECURI
  • [9] APERC, 2007, 207RE012 APEC
  • [10] Improving government policy on risk: Eight key principles
    Aven, Terje
    Renn, Ortwin
    [J]. RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 176 : 230 - 241