Multitarget stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening: A review and commentary on the United States Preventive Services Draft Guidelines

被引:21
作者
Berger, Barry M. [1 ]
Levin, Bernard [2 ]
Hilsden, Robert J. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Exact Sci Corp, Med Affairs, 5801 Res Pk Blvd, Madison, WI 53719 USA
[2] Exact Sci, Sci Advisory Board, New York, NY 10025 USA
[3] Univ Calgary, Dept Med, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
[4] Univ Calgary, Dept Community Hlth Sci, Calgary, AB T2N 4N1, Canada
关键词
Colorectal cancer screening; Multitarget stool DNA; Stool DNA; The United States Preventive Services Task Force; Cancer Intervention Surveillance Modeling Network; Fecal immunological technique; Modeling; Interval; LONGITUDINAL ADHERENCE; PERFORMANCE; COLONOSCOPY; NEOPLASIA;
D O I
10.4251/wjgo.v8.i5.450
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
for average risk colorectal cancer (CRC) screening by the United States Food and Drug Administration and thereafter reimbursed for use by the Medicare program (2014). The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) October 2015 draft recommendation for CRC screening included mt-sDNA as an "alternative" screening test that "may be useful in select clinical circumstances", despite its very high sensitivity for early stage CRC. The evidence supporting mt-sDNA for routine screening use is robust. The clinical efficacy of mt-sDNA as measured by sensitivity, specificity, life-years gained (LYG), and CRC deaths averted is similar to or exceeds that of the other more specifically recommended screening options included in the draft document, especially those requiring annual testing adherence. In a population with primarily irregular screening par-ticipation, tests with the highest point sensitivity and reasonable specificity are more likely to favorably impact CRC related morbidity and mortality than those depending on annual adherence. This paper reviews the evidence supporting mt-sDNA for routine screening and demonstrates, using USPSTF's modeling data, that mt-sDNA at three-year intervals provides significant clinical net benefits and fewer complications per LYG than annual fecal immunochemical testing, high sensitivity guaiac based fecal occult blood testing and 10-year colonoscopy screening.
引用
收藏
页码:450 / 458
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Stool DNA-based versus colonoscopy-based colorectal cancer screening: Patient perceptions and preferences [J].
Abola, Matthew V. ;
Fennimore, Todd F. ;
Chen, Marcia M. ;
Chen, Zhengyi ;
Sheth, Ashutosh K. ;
Cooper, Gregory ;
Li, Li .
FAMILY MEDICINE AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2015, 3 (03) :2-8
[2]  
[Anonymous], CANC FACTS FIG 2015
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2015, J PATHOL S1, V237, pS1, DOI [10.1002/path.4631, DOI 10.1002/path.4631]
[4]   Screening for Colorectal Cancer Using a Multitarget Stool DNA Test: Modeling the Effect of the Intertest Interval on Clinical Effectiveness [J].
Berger, Barry M. ;
Schroy, Paul C., III ;
Dinh, Tuan A. .
CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2016, 15 (03) :E65-E74
[5]  
Berger BM, 2016, AM J MANAG CARE, V22, pE77
[6]   Colorectal Cancer Screening With Multi-target Stool DNA-based Testing: Previous Screening History of the Initial Patient Cohort [J].
Berger, Barry M. ;
Hooker, Ana ;
Bethke, Lisa ;
Parton, Marcus ;
Myers, Eran ;
Laffin, Jennifer .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 :S607-S607
[7]   Stool DNA screening for colorectal neoplasia: biological and technical basis for high detection rates [J].
Berger, Barry M. ;
Ahlquist, David A. .
PATHOLOGY, 2012, 44 (02) :80-88
[8]  
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, 2014, CAG00440N CTR MED ME
[9]   Preferences for Colorectal Screening Tests Among a Previously Unscreened Population [J].
Cole, Doria ;
Mai, Erik ;
Gaebler, Julia ;
Hochberg, Donna ;
Dugan, Michael ;
Schroy, Paul ;
Calderwood, Audrey H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2015, 110 :S614-S614
[10]  
Cyhaniuk A, 2016, AM J MANAG CARE, V22, P105