Soil quality indices of paddy soils in Guilan province of northern Iran: Spatial variability and their influential parameters

被引:39
作者
Rezaee, Leila [1 ]
Moosavi, Ali Akbar [1 ]
Davatgar, Naser [2 ]
Sepaskhah, Ali Reza [3 ]
机构
[1] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Soil Sci, Shiraz, Iran
[2] Soil & Water Res Inst, Karaj, Iran
[3] Shiraz Univ, Coll Agr, Dept Irrigat Sci, Shiraz, Iran
关键词
Fuzzy set; Principal component analysis; Minimum data set; Rice; Spatial variability; LAND SUITABILITY ASSESSMENT; PHYSICOCHEMICAL PROPERTIES; CLAY SOIL; MANAGEMENT; RICE; INDICATORS; WATER; FERTILIZATION; SHRINKAGE; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106566
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Soil quality (SQ) is an important issue in soil science, ecology, agronomy, and environmental sciences that has been received increased attention due to its importance in the sustainability of ecosystem and soil management. Biological and physicochemical soil traits, as sensitive variables to changes in soil functions, mainly used as major parameters in SQ assessment. Soil quality index (SQI) is the most suitable index to evaluate the quality of soils. This study aimed to 1) evaluate the quality of paddy-field soils using three approaches (integrate quality index, IQI; physical index, PI; Fuzzy) to develop a credible SQI for rice cultivation and 2) model the spatial variability of the SQIs. 120 soil samples were taken from rice cropping land within the study area (Shaft and Fouman counties, Guilan province, and north of IR Iran). Fifteen soil variables were considered to calculate SQI of the paddy soils. Principal component analysis (PCA) approach applied to choose the minimum data set (MDS). Both non-linear and linear scoring procedures used to compute the SQI. Four principal components (PC) ex-plained nearly 70% of the overall SQI variability. Fuzzy method clearly investigated the main limiting soil factors in paddy fields and the GIS-based SQ maps could be useful for decision-makers. The correlation coeffi-cients (r) between the fuzzy results by non-linear scoring and rice yields were relatively good (0.70). Whereas, the results of Gupta model and yield had very low correlation (r = 0.24). Application of fuzzy sets with non-linear scoring function provided a more accurate assessment of SQ as compared with that obtained in other approaches. Majority of the study area had low SQ and the most severe limitation (SQI < 0.58) and need better management practices for improving soil quality.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 73 条
[1]   GIS model-builder based on comprehensive geostatistical approach to assess soil quality [J].
AbdelRahman, Mohamed A. E. ;
Tahoun, Salah .
REMOTE SENSING APPLICATIONS-SOCIETY AND ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 13 :204-214
[2]   Assessment and mapping of spatial variation of soil physical health in a farm [J].
Amirinejad, Ali Ashraf ;
Kamble, Kalpana ;
Aggarwal, Pramila ;
Chakraborty, Debashis ;
Pradhan, Sanatan ;
Mittal, Raj Bala .
GEODERMA, 2011, 160 (3-4) :292-303
[3]   A comparison of soil quality indexing methods for vegetable production systems in Northern California [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Mitchell, JP .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 90 (01) :25-45
[4]   The soil management assessment framework: A quantitative soil quality evaluation method [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Karlen, DL ;
Cambardella, CA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 2004, 68 (06) :1945-1962
[5]   On-farm assessment of soil quality in California's central valley [J].
Andrews, SS ;
Mitchell, JP ;
Mancinelli, R ;
Karlen, DL ;
Hartz, TK ;
Horwath, WR ;
Pettygrove, GS ;
Scow, KM ;
Munk, DS .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2002, 94 (01) :12-23
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2017, ASTM
[7]  
Blake GR., 1986, Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1: Physical and Mineralogical Methods
[8]  
Booltink H.W.G., 2002, METHODS SOIL ANAL 4, P812
[9]   Land quality indicators of sustainable land management across scales [J].
Bouma, J .
AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2002, 88 (02) :129-136
[10]  
Bouman BAM., 2001, ORYZA 2000 MODELING