Application of case-based reasoning and multi-criteria decision-making methods for material selection in petrochemistry

被引:15
作者
Berman, Aleksander F. [1 ]
Maltugueva, Galina S. [1 ]
Yurin, Aleksander Y. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Russian Acad Sci, Matrosov Inst Syst Dynam & Control Theory, Siberian Branch, Lermontov 134, Irkutsk 664033, Russia
[2] Natl Res Irkutsk State Tech Univ, Irkutsk, Russia
关键词
Case-based reasoning; multi-criteria decision-making; expert system; construction materials; materials research; DESIGN; SYSTEM; TOOL;
D O I
10.1177/1464420715620919
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
This paper describes a decision support approach for selecting construction materials in the field of petrochemistry. The correct selection of construction materials is the basis for the provision of durability, long lifetime, and the safety of the designed and upgraded equipment. The proposed hybrid approach is based on the joint application of case-based reasoning and multi-criteria decision-making methods, particularly the aggregation and ranking alternatives nearby the multi-attribute ideal situation (ARAMIS) and aggregation of individual ranking/ complex of aggregation of individual ranking (AIR/CAIR) methods are used. In turn, ARAMIS enables the processing of individual preferences, which are represented in the form of numeric and verbal estimates, and AIR/CAIR is used for processing rankings (strictly or partially ordered sets of alternatives). The primary advantage of this approach is that it considers the experience of previous successful solutions of the materials selection problem, demonstrates the validity of the obtained results using the mathematical theory of multi-criteria decision making and explains the decision making process. The approach is implemented in the form of the expert system. The case model, algorithms, and an illustrative example of application of the proposed approach are also presented.
引用
收藏
页码:204 / 212
页数:9
相关论文
共 28 条
  • [1] AAMODT A, 1994, AI COMMUN, V7, P39
  • [2] Case-based reasoning as a tool for materials selection
    Amen, R
    Vomacka, P
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2001, 22 (05): : 353 - 358
  • [3] Comparative analysis of MCDM methods for pipe material selection in sugar industry
    Anojkumar, L.
    Ilangkumaran, M.
    Sasirekha, V.
    [J]. EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2014, 41 (06) : 2964 - 2980
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1988, Axioms of Cooperative Decision Making
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2002, Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2002, LNCS
  • [7] Ashby M. F., 2002, Materials and design: The art and science of material selection in product design
  • [8] Multi-objective optimization in material design and selection
    Ashby, MF
    [J]. ACTA MATERIALIA, 2000, 48 (01) : 359 - 369
  • [9] Selection strategies for materials and processes
    Ashby, MF
    Bréchet, YJM
    Cebon, D
    Salvo, L
    [J]. MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2004, 25 (01) : 51 - 67
  • [10] Material selection using multi-criteria decision-making methods: a comparative study
    Athawale, Vijay Manikrao
    Chakraborty, Shankar
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART L-JOURNAL OF MATERIALS-DESIGN AND APPLICATIONS, 2012, 226 (L4) : 266 - 285