One-Year Outcomes of Peripheral Endovascular Device Intervention in Critical Limb Ischemia Patients: Sub-Analysis of the LIBERTY 360 Study

被引:12
作者
Mustapha, Jihad A. [1 ,2 ]
Igyarto, Zsuzsanna [3 ]
O'Connor, David [4 ]
Armstrong, Ehrin J. [5 ,6 ]
Iorio, Anthony R. [7 ]
Driver, Vickie R. [8 ]
Saab, Fadi [2 ]
Behrens, Ann N. [3 ]
Martinsen, Brad J. [3 ]
Adams, George L. [9 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Coll Osteopath Med, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Adv Cardiac & Vasc Amputat Prevent Ctr, 1525 East Beltline NE,Suite 101, Grand Rapids, MI 49525 USA
[3] Cardiovasc Syst Inc, St Paul, MN USA
[4] Hackensack Univ, Med Ctr, Hackensack, NJ USA
[5] Denver VA Med Ctr, Denver, CO USA
[6] Univ Colorado, Anschutz Med Campus, Denver, CO 80202 USA
[7] New York Coll Podiat Med, Foot Ctr New York, New York, NY USA
[8] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Orthoped, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[9] UNC Sch Med, Rex Hosp, North Carolina Heart & Vasc, Raleigh, NC USA
关键词
amputation; critical limb ischemia; CLI; endovascular therapy; LOWER-EXTREMITY AMPUTATIONS; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; DISEASE; REVASCULARIZATION; MORTALITY; GUIDELINE; STANDARDS; SURGERY; TRENDS; IMPACT;
D O I
10.2147/VHRM.S230934
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Background: High-risk patients with advanced peripheral artery disease (PAD), including critical limb ischemia (CLI), are often excluded from peripheral endovascular device intervention clinical trials, leading to difficulty in translating trial results into real-world practice. There is a need for prospectively assessed studies to evaluate peripheral endovascular device intervention outcomes in CLI patients. Methods: LIBERTY 360 is a prospective, observational, multi-center study designed to evaluate the procedural and long-term clinical outcomes of peripheral endovascular device intervention in real-world patients with symptomatic lower-extremity PAD. One thousand two hundred and four patients were enrolled and stratified based on Rutherford Classification (RC): RC2-3 (N=501), RC4-5 (N=603), and RC6 (N=100). For this sub-analysis, RC5 and RC6 patients (RC5-6; N=404) were pooled and 1-year outcomes were assessed. Results: Procedural complications rarely (1.7%) resulted in post-procedural hospitalization and 89.1% of RC5-6 patients were discharged to home. Considering the advanced disease state in RC5-6 patients, there was a high freedom from 1-year major adverse event rate of 65.5% (defined as target vessel revascularization, death to 30 days, and major target limb amputation). At 1 year, freedom from major amputation was 89.6%. Wounds identified at baseline on the target limb had completely healed in 172/243 (70.8%) of the RC5-6 subjects by 1 year. Additionally, the overall quality of life, as measured by VascuQoL, improved from baseline to 1 year. Conclusion: LIBERTY investigated real-world PAD patients with independent oversight of outcomes. This analysis of LIBERTY RC5-6 patients demonstrates that peripheral endovascular device intervention can be successful in CLI patients, with low rates of major amputation and improvement in wound healing and quality of life through 1-year follow-up.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 66
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   A prospective analysis of critical limb ischemia: Factors leading to major primary amputation versus Revascularization [J].
Abou-Zamzam, Ahmed M., Jr. ;
Gomez, Nephtali R. ;
Molkara, Afshin ;
Banta, Jim E. ;
Teruya, Theodore H. ;
Killeen, J. David ;
Bianchi, Christian .
ANNALS OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2007, 21 (04) :458-463
[2]   The natural history of untreated severe or critical limb ischemia [J].
Abu Dabrh, Abd Moain ;
Steffen, Mark W. ;
Undavalli, Chaitanya ;
Asi, Noor ;
Wang, Zhen ;
Elamin, Mohamed B. ;
Conte, Michael S. ;
Murad, Mohammad Hassan .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 62 (06) :1642-+
[3]   The LIBERTY study: Design of a prospective, observational, multicenter trial to evaluate the acute and long-term clinical and economic outcomes of real-world endovascular device interventions in treating peripheral artery disease [J].
Adams, George L. ;
Mustapha, Jihad ;
Gray, William ;
Hargus, Nick J. ;
Martinsen, Brad J. ;
Ansel, Gary ;
Jaff, Michael R. .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 2016, 174 :14-21
[4]   Burden of Readmissions Among Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia [J].
Agarwal, Shikhar ;
Pitcavage, James M. ;
Sud, Karan ;
Thakkar, Badal .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2017, 69 (15) :1897-1908
[5]   Nationwide Trends of Hospital Admission and Outcomes Among Critical Limb Ischemia Patients From 2003-2011 [J].
Agarwal, Shikhar ;
Sud, Karan ;
Shishehbor, Mehdi H. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2016, 67 (16) :1901-1913
[6]  
Allie David E, 2005, EuroIntervention, V1, P75
[7]  
Allie DE, 2009, J ENDOVASC THER, V16, P134
[8]   Bypass surgery for chronic lower limb ischaemia [J].
Antoniou, George A. ;
Georgiadis, George S. ;
Antoniou, Stavros A. ;
Makar, Ragai R. ;
Smout, Jonathan D. ;
Torella, Francesco .
COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS, 2017, (04)
[9]   Risk of major amputation or death among patients with critical limb ischemia initially treated with endovascular intervention, surgical bypass, minor amputation, or conservative management [J].
Armstrong, Ehrin J. ;
Ryan, Michael P. ;
Baker, Erin R. ;
Martinsen, Brad J. ;
Kotlarz, Harry ;
Gunnarsson, Candace .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 20 (11) :1148-1154
[10]   Endovascular Revascularization for Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: Impact on Wound Healing and Long Term Clinical Results in 189 Limbs [J].
Bae, Jae-Ik ;
Won, Je Hwan ;
Han, Seung Hwan ;
Lim, Sang Hyun ;
Hong, You Sun ;
Kim, Jae-Young ;
Kim, Ji Dae ;
Kim, Jun-Su .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 14 (03) :430-438