MCMC Guided CNN Training and Segmentation for Pancreas Extraction

被引:10
作者
Tian, Mu [1 ]
He, Jinchan [1 ]
Yu, Xiaxia [1 ]
Cai, Chudong [4 ]
Gao, Yi [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Shenzhen Univ, Sch Biomed Engn, Hlth Sci Ctr, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[2] Pengcheng Lab, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[3] Marshall Lab Biomed Engn, Shenzhen 518060, Peoples R China
[4] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Shantou Hosp, Shantou Cent Hosp, Dept Gen Surg, Shantou 515031, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Pancreas; Image segmentation; Three-dimensional displays; Training; Computed tomography; Two dimensional displays; Testing; Pancreas segmentation; image registration; MCMC; 3D convolutional neural network; BOTTOM-UP APPROACH;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3070391
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Efficient organ segmentation is the precondition of various quantitative analysis. Segmenting the pancreas from abdominal CT images is a challenging task because of its high anatomical variability in shape, size and location. What's more, the pancreas only occupies a small portion in abdomen, and the organ border is very fuzzy. All these factors make the segmentation methods of other organs less suitable for pancreas. In this work, we propose a Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) guided convolutional neural network (CNN) approach, in order to handle such difficulties in morphological and photometric variabilities. Specifically, the proposed method mainly consists of three steps: First, registration is carried out to mitigate the body weight and location variability. Then, an MCMC scheme is designed to guide the adaptive selection of 3D patches, which are fed to the CNN for training. At the same time, the pancreas distribution is also learned for subsequent segmentation. Eventually, the same MCMC process guides the segmentation process with patch-wise predictions fused using a Bayesian voting scheme. This method is evaluated on the NIH pancreatic dataset including 82 abdominal contrast-enhanced CT volumes. We have achieved a competitive result of 78.13% Dice Similarity Coefficient value and 82.65% Recall value in testing data.
引用
收藏
页码:90539 / 90554
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, P INT C LEARN REPR
[2]  
Avendi M.R., 2016, Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, V18, P1
[3]   Original Investigation Technical and Clinical Factors Affecting Success Rate of a Deep Learning Method for Pancreas Segmentation on CT [J].
Bagheri, Mohammad Hadi ;
Roth, Holger ;
Kovacs, William ;
Yao, Jianhua ;
Farhadi, Faraz ;
Li, Xiaobai ;
Summers, Ronald M. .
ACADEMIC RADIOLOGY, 2020, 27 (05) :689-695
[4]  
Cai J., 2018, ARXIV PREPRINT ARXIV
[5]  
Cai Jinzheng, 2016, Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv, V9901, P442, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_51
[6]   DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFs [J].
Chen, Liang-Chieh ;
Papandreou, George ;
Kokkinos, Iasonas ;
Murphy, Kevin ;
Yuille, Alan L. .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2018, 40 (04) :834-848
[7]   UNDERSTANDING THE METROPOLIS-HASTINGS ALGORITHM [J].
CHIB, S ;
GREENBERG, E .
AMERICAN STATISTICIAN, 1995, 49 (04) :327-335
[8]  
Cicek Ozgun, 2016, Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention - MICCAI 2016. 19th International Conference. Proceedings: LNCS 9901, P424, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-46723-8_49
[9]   The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository [J].
Clark, Kenneth ;
Vendt, Bruce ;
Smith, Kirk ;
Freymann, John ;
Kirby, Justin ;
Koppel, Paul ;
Moore, Stephen ;
Phillips, Stanley ;
Maffitt, David ;
Pringle, Michael ;
Tarbox, Lawrence ;
Prior, Fred .
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL IMAGING, 2013, 26 (06) :1045-1057
[10]  
Dai Y., 2021, PROC IEEE WINTER C A, P950