Taking climate change seriously: Time to credibly communicate on corporate climate performance

被引:15
作者
Le Ravalec, Mickaele [1 ]
Rambaud, Alexandre [2 ]
Blum, Veronique [3 ]
机构
[1] IFPEN Energies nouvelles, Earth Sci & Environm Technol Div, 1&4 Ave Bois Preau, F-92852 Rueil Malmaison, France
[2] Univ Paris Saclay AgroParis Tech, CIRED, Saclay, France
[3] Grenoble Alpes Univ, CERAG, Grenoble, France
关键词
System theory; Luhmann; Global warming; Climate performance; Climate accounting; Offsetting; Carbon neutrality; CARBON; EMISSIONS; LUHMANN; RISK;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolecon.2022.107542
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
To address climate change, regulators have required companies to provide more information about their envi-ronmental impact such as their greenhouse gas emissions. However, reporting choices lacking comprehensive-ness, corporate report users cannot assess how much companies contribute to limiting global warming. This research presents a new problematization of the multiple facets of this phenomenon and the subsequent communication requirements, drawn on the Luhmann's system theory. We position the issue successively in the scientific, political, and economic systems. Our analysis suggests that the economic system is unable to properly capture the messages from its environment and that it favors the outside-in perspective over the inside-out one, meaning that it focuses on the impact of its environment on itself and not the opposite. Therefore, any definition of corporate climate performance by the economic system will be limited because this system, like any other, is forced to understand its environment from its own perspective. We suggest that a new system, fully dedicated to sustainability, would be more appropriate to handle this concept and propose to consider corporate climate performance as an indicator reflecting how far a firm is from a targeted trajectory for keeping global warming below a threshold.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]  
26Richard J., 2012, Comptabilite et developpement durable
[2]   Academics and policymakers at odds: the case of the IFRS Foundation Trustees' consultation paper on sustainability reporting [J].
Adams, Carol A. ;
Mueller, Frank .
SUSTAINABILITY ACCOUNTING MANAGEMENT AND POLICY JOURNAL, 2022, 13 (06) :1310-1333
[3]  
Akerman M., 2005, LEARNING NATURAL CAP, P48
[4]  
Albert M., 2016, Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Politics, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACREFORE/9780190228637.013.7
[5]   Ecological economics: A Luhmannian analysis of integrated reporting [J].
Alexander, David ;
Blum, Veronique .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2016, 129 :241-251
[6]   Ensuring that offsets and other internationally transferred mitigation outcomes contribute effectively to limiting global warming [J].
Allen, Myles ;
Tanaka, Katsumasa ;
Macey, Adrian ;
Cain, Michelle ;
Jenkins, Stuart ;
Lynch, John ;
Smith, Matthew .
ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2021, 16 (07)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2014, COMM ORGANIS
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Ecological Communication
[9]   THE NATURAL ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGIES OF INTERNATIONAL FIRMS: OLD CONTROVERSIES AND NEW EVIDENCE ON PERFORMANCE AND DISCLOSURE [J].
Aragon-Correa, J. Alberto ;
Marcus, Alfred ;
Hurtado-Torres, Nuria .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT PERSPECTIVES, 2016, 30 (01) :24-39
[10]  
Arrhenium S., 1896, PHILOS MAG, V41, P237, DOI DOI 10.1080/14786449608620846