Patient experience and overall satisfaction after emergency abdominal surgery

被引:32
作者
Jones, C. H. [1 ]
O'Neill, S. [1 ]
McLean, K. A. [1 ]
Wigmore, S. J. [1 ]
Harrison, E. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Royal Infirm Edinburgh, Clin Surg, 51 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh EH16 4SA, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Patient experience; Emergency surgery; Patient satisfaction; HEALTH-CARE; QUALITY; OUTCOMES; CANCER;
D O I
10.1186/s12893-017-0271-5
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: There is a growing recognition of the importance of patient experience in healthcare, however little is known in the context of emergency abdominal surgery. This study sought to quantify the association between patient experience and overall satisfaction. Methods: Patient demographics, operation details and 30-day clinical outcome data of consecutive patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery were collected. Data was collected using validated Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) questionnaires. Categorical data were tested using Mann Whitney U test. Multivariable regression was used to determine independent factors associated with satisfaction. Results: In a well-fitting multivariable analysis (R-2 = 0.71), variables significantly associated with a higher global satisfaction score were "sufficient information given about treatment" (beta = 0.86, 95% CI 0.01-1.70, p = 0.047), "sufficient explanation of risks and benefits of surgery" (beta = 1.26, 95% CI 0.18-2.34, p = 0.020), "absence of night-time noise" (beta = 1.35, 95% CI 0.56-2.14, p = 0.001) and "confidence and trust in nurses" (beta = 1.51, 95% CI 0.54-2.49, p = 0.003). Conclusions: Overall patient satisfaction was strongly associated with perceptions of good communication and transfer of information. Confidence and trust in the clinical team is an important determinant of patient experience. Improving the ward environment by reducing noise at night may also improve the overall experience and satisfaction in emergency surgery.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EQ EXC LIB NHS
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MAK CAS INF EV INV H
[3]   Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals [J].
Asch, DA ;
Jedrziewski, MK ;
Christakis, NA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 50 (10) :1129-1136
[4]  
Coulter A., 2006, Patient-focused interventions: a review ofthe evidence
[5]  
Currie K, 2013, IMPROVING PATIENT EX
[6]  
Darzi A., 2008, High Quality Care for All: NHS Next Stage Review Final Report
[7]  
De Silva D., 2013, EVIDENCE SCAN MEAS P
[8]  
Detmer D, 2013, INFORMED PATIENT STU
[9]  
Devlin N., 2010, Getting the most out of PROMS: putting health outcomes at the heart of the NHS decision-making
[10]   A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness [J].
Doyle, Cathal ;
Lennox, Laura ;
Bell, Derek .
BMJ OPEN, 2013, 3 (01)