On the Assessment of e-Banking Websites Supporting Sustainable Development Goals

被引:7
作者
Chmielarz, Witold [1 ]
Zborowski, Marek [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Warsaw, Fac Management, Krakowskie Przedmiescie 26-28, PL-00927 Warsaw, Poland
关键词
m-banking; i-banking; methods of multicriteria decision making; quality assessment of multicriteria methods; DECISION-MAKING; SERVICES;
D O I
10.3390/en15010378
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The main aim of this article was to test the authors' proprietary method (i.e., the conversion method applied to evaluate e-banking services that support sustainable development goals in households, communities, and society). The authors' conversion method can be applied with the aim of maintaining a balance between households, producers, and public administration services in line with the principles of sustainable development of the information society in Poland. To achieve this goal, the authors identified the differences between the results obtained using the conversion method and the results produced by other methods such as TOPSIS, Promethee II, and PROSA involving the same group of respondents. A hypothesis was made about the existence of significant differences in the results obtained as part of the studies. The research was carried out on a sample of nearly 830 ratings concerning the 27 most popular electronic banks in Poland. As part of the survey, the respondents assessed 18 characteristics (attributes) of the selected banks using a simplified Likert scale. The study was conducted during the pandemic in Poland in 2020. The authors compared the results achieved in the case of the TOPSIS, Promethee II, and PROSA methods and the ones obtained with the application of the conversion method. Then, the ratings of the e-banking websites were arranged in descending order, and the distances between the positions in the rankings obtained by the conversion method and other methods were calculated. In addition, the R2 correlation coefficients were calculated for all combinations of the results received using individual methods. The results showed the greatest differences both in the absolute distances between the positions obtained in the ranking and the lowest value of the R2 correlation coefficient in the case of the conversion method in relation to the other methods. The limitation of the present research resulted from the fact that the study sample included respondents who were all members of the academic environment. The students analyzed in the study were part of a group supporting globalization processes where e-business solutions are widely used. However, the purchases of goods and services both local and foreign made by this group were often limited in scope and value due to a lack of funds. The research results indicate a potential need for improvement of the conversion method.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2016, SUSTAINABLE INFORM S
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, DIGITAL SOLUTIONS CO, DOI DOI 10.4018/978-1-4666-8430-0
[3]   Towards Objectification of Multi-Criteria Assessments: a Comparative Study on MCDA Methods [J].
Baczkiewicz, Aleksandra ;
Watrobski, Jaroslaw ;
Kizielewicz, Bartlomiej ;
Salabun, Wojciech .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2021 16TH CONFERENCE ON COMPUTER SCIENCE AND INTELLIGENCE SYSTEMS (FEDCSIS), 2021, :417-425
[4]   Evaluating the Application of Decision Analysis Methods in Simulated Alternatives Assessment Case Studies: Potential Benefits and Challenges of Using MCDA [J].
Beaudrie, Christian ;
Corbett, Charles J. ;
Lewandowski, Thomas A. ;
Malloy, Timothy ;
Zhou, Xiaoying .
INTEGRATED ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT AND MANAGEMENT, 2021, 17 (01) :27-41
[5]   A state-of the-art survey of TOPSIS applications [J].
Behzadian, Majid ;
Otaghsara, S. Khanmohammadi ;
Yazdani, Morteza ;
Ignatius, Joshua .
EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2012, 39 (17) :13051-13069
[6]  
Borys T, 2011, PROBL EKOROZW, V6, P75
[7]  
BRANS J.P., 1982, LINGENIERIE DECISION
[8]  
Buchanan J.T., 1999, Project ranking using ELECTRE III
[9]  
Chmielarz Witold, 2020, Procedia Computer Science, V176, P1903, DOI 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.230
[10]  
Chmielarz W., 2011, KOMPLEKSOWE METODY E