RISK FRAMEWORK FOR ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACTING BUILDING RETROFITS

被引:14
作者
Berghorn, George H. [1 ]
Syal, M. G. Matt [1 ]
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Sch Planning Design & Construct, 552 W,Circle Dr, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING | 2016年 / 11卷 / 02期
关键词
energy performance contracting (EPC); energy efficient building practices; building retrofits; project performance risks; projected utility savings; controlling operating costs; DELPHI TECHNIQUE; DESIGN; MODEL;
D O I
10.3992/jgb.11.2.93.1
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Energy performance contracting (EPC) has emerged as a useful project financing and delivery tool for building retrofits, particularly among building ownerships which have experienced reduced funding for capital projects. Through EPC, a contractor (called the EPC contractor or the energy service company) guarantees minimum energy savings performance and enables the building owner to finance the project using utility savings over the length of the project (which is typically 12-15 years, or longer). Despite its growing use, there is a dearth of literature regarding a contractor's risks related to the delivery and execution of EPC building retrofits. This is particularly important as the performance guarantee effectively transfers project performance risk from the owner to the EPC contractor. This research proposes a project factors-based risk framework for EPC building retrofits, initially developed through a comprehensive review of relevant literature and project documents and refined through the elicited expertise of 19 highly experienced EPC contracting professionals. A Delphi technique-based expertise elicitation strategy was used to confirm the findings of the a priori (literature-based) framework and provide additional analysis related to risk causes and control measures as well as relative risk importance. This information was used to construct a refined risk framework which provides insight into the lengthy project performance period during the earliest phases of the project's life cycle. This has the advantage of providing rapid screening of the project factors that can potentially lead to the greatest project performance risks.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 115
页数:23
相关论文
共 88 条
  • [1] AN INTERACTIVE DESIGN ADVISOR FOR ENERGY EFFICIENT BUILDINGS
    Abaza, Hussein
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GREEN BUILDING, 2008, 3 (01): : 112 - 125
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, BUILD EN DAT BOOK
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2000, BEST PRACTICE GUIDE
  • [4] Appleman T., 2010, P WEFTEC 2010 OCT 2
  • [5] ASHRAE, 2011, PROC COMM BUILD EN A
  • [6] Causes of delay in large construction projects
    Construction Engineering and Management Department, King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals, Box # 680, Dhahran, 31261, Saudi Arabia
    [J]. Int. J. Proj. Manage., 2006, 4 (349-357): : 349 - 357
  • [7] Baechler M. C., 2011, PNNL20956
  • [8] Banaitiene N., 2012, RISK MANAGEMENT CURR
  • [9] Barbose G. L., 2013, LBNL5803E
  • [10] Berghorn G. H., 2014, THESIS