An Integrated Shannon-PAF Method on Gray Numbers to Rank Technology Transfer Strategies

被引:7
作者
Amirghodsi, Sirous [1 ]
Naeini, Ali Bonyadi [2 ]
Roozbehani, Behrooz [3 ]
机构
[1] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Progress Engn Dept, Technol Management, Tehran, Iran
[2] Iran Univ Sci & Technol, Progress Engn Dept, Tehran, Iran
[3] Petrotex Publishing Grp, Friendswood, TX USA
关键词
Shannon Entropy Method; Paf Method; Gray Numbers; Technology Transfer; Technology Management; Project Management; Technology Selection; DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS; DECISION-MAKING METHOD; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; HIERARCHY PROCESS; SELECTION; MODEL; AHP; ACQUISITION; FRAMEWORK; TOPSIS;
D O I
10.1080/10429247.2020.1738879
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The selection of an appropriate technology transfer (TT) method is a complex multidimensional problem, which involves a multitude of situational qualitative and quantitative criteria. Despite multiple classifications and effective practices, expert opinion is still essential for every case. The complexity and dependence of TT method selection on human judgment have led to an increase in the application and integration of Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making (MCGDM) methods, as well as fuzzy and gray systems theories, to address uncertainties related to data collection and selection of TT methods and criteria. The present study contributes to this trend by presenting a novel integrated Shannon-Projection Attribute Function (PAF) method, based on three-parameter interval gray numbers and describes its application in TT methods for the building industry. To calculate the weight of the assessment criteria, selected based on the literature review and Delphi panel, Shannon entropy can reduce uncertainties associated with the weighting criteria. Furthermore, three-parameter interval gray numbers can reduce uncertainties related to expert appraisal. In this study, we used the PAF method to rank TT methods. Also, we presented a brief analysis of the method application in the building industry. The results showed that reverse engineering and import of capital goods and machinery are the best TT methods, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:186 / 207
页数:22
相关论文
共 128 条
[1]  
Abdullah L., 2017, MOD APPL SCI, V11, P64
[2]   Technology transfer through imports [J].
Acharya, Ram C. ;
Keller, Wolfgang .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS-REVUE CANADIENNE D ECONOMIQUE, 2009, 42 (04) :1411-1448
[3]   Technology selection and evaluation in Iran's pulp and paper industry using 2-filterd fuzzy decision making method [J].
Akhundzadeh, Maryam ;
Shirazi, Babak .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2017, 142 :3028-3043
[4]   Leveraging technological knowledge transfer by using fuzzy linear programming technique for multiattribute group decision making with fuzzy decision variables [J].
Albayrak, Y. Esra ;
Erensal, Yasemin Claire .
JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT MANUFACTURING, 2009, 20 (02) :223-231
[5]   A Hybrid MCDM Approach Based on Fuzzy ANP and Fuzzy TOPSIS for Technology Selection [J].
Aliakbari Nouri, Fahimeh ;
Khalili Esbouei, Saber ;
Antucheviciene, Jurgita .
INFORMATICA, 2015, 26 (03) :369-388
[6]   Technology assessment with IF-TOPSIS: An application in the advanced underwater system sector [J].
Aloini, Davide ;
Dulmin, Riccardo ;
Mininno, Valeria ;
Pellegrini, Luisa ;
Farina, Giulia .
TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 131 :38-48
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2012, INT J INFORM SECURIT
[8]  
Asad MM, 2015, INT ACAD J BUSINESS, V2, P12
[9]  
Attaran R., 2014, DECISION SCI LETT, V3, P85, DOI [10.5267/j.dsl.2013.07.009, DOI 10.5267/J.DSL.2013.07.009]
[10]  
AZAR A, 2003, INT J INFORM SCI MAN, V1, P1