'Spaces of Exclusion' in community water governance: A Feminist Political Ecology of gender and participation in Malawi's Urban Water User Associations

被引:65
作者
Adams, Ellis Adjei [1 ,2 ]
Juran, Luke [3 ,4 ]
Ajibade, Idowu [5 ]
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Global Studies Inst, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[2] Georgia State Univ, Dept Geosci, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[3] Virginia Tech, Dept Geog, 125 Major Williams Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[4] Virginia Tech, Virginia Water Resources Res Ctr, 125 Major Williams Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061 USA
[5] Portland State Univ, Dept Geog, 1721 SW Broadway, Portland, OR 97201 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Feminist Political Ecology; Water User Associations; Gender; Participation; Urban Water Governance; Malawi; WOMEN; MANAGEMENT; PROJECT;
D O I
10.1016/j.geoforum.2018.06.016
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学]; K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
Much of the literature on gender dimensions of community-based water governance focuses on irrigation systems in rural areas. Largely overlooked is how gender dynamics influence participation in community-based urban water governance systems. To address this gap, we use insights from Feminist Political Ecology (FPE) to examine whether and how community-based governance of drinking water in an urban context leads to (in) equitable gender participation and decision making. Using household surveys (n = 415), key informant interviews (n = 19), focus-group discussions (n = 14), we explore gender dynamics and power relations underpinning participation, decision making processes, and employment and benefit sharing arrangements among Water User Associations (WUAs) in the urban informal settlements of Lilongwe, Malawi. We find that WUAs do not guarantee equitable gender participation. Rather, inequitable participation is simply reified through: (1) gendered representation in WUA structures; (2) socio-cultural practices and women's self-exclusion; and (3) community micro-politics and power relations. Our findings contradict the notion that community-based governance of water leads to equitable participation and empowerment of women. The policy implications are that without systematic efforts to incorporate women's needs, interests, and voices, so-called participatory approaches to water governance will only serve to suppress women's agency and reinforce existing gender-based inequalities. Future work will explore the pathways to women's leadership in the WUAs and interrogate how women on the board and executive committees navigate their way up the hierarchy, their experiences in a male dominated water governance scheme and their recommendations for how WUAs can improve women's participation.
引用
收藏
页码:133 / 142
页数:10
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
Adams E. A., 2018, Int. J. Water Resour. Develop., P1
[2]   Participants or customers in water governance? Community-public partnerships for pen-urban water supply [J].
Adams, Ellis Adjei ;
Zulu, Leo Charles .
GEOFORUM, 2015, 65 :112-124
[3]   Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for South Asia and a conceptual framework [J].
Agarwal, B .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2001, 29 (10) :1623-1648
[4]   Gender mainstreaming and climate change [J].
Alston, Margaret .
WOMENS STUDIES INTERNATIONAL FORUM, 2014, 47 :287-294
[5]  
[Anonymous], MAL GEND EQ FACT SHE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2018, INT J WATER RESOUR D, DOI DOI 10.1080/07900627.2017.1322941
[7]  
[Anonymous], DEV EXPERIENCE CLEAR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2002, AGENDA, DOI DOI 10.2307/4066469
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Qualitative research Wiley Online Library
[10]  
[Anonymous], NAT GEND POL MIN GEN