Assessing the acquisition of requesting a variety of preferred items using different speech generating device formats for children with autism spectrum disorder

被引:11
作者
Gevarter, Cindy [1 ,3 ,4 ]
O'Reilly, Mark F. [1 ]
Kuhn, Michelle [1 ]
Watkins, Laci [1 ]
Ferguson, Raechal [1 ]
Sammarco, Nicolette [1 ]
Rojeski, Laura [1 ]
Sigafoos, Jeff [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Special Educ, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Victoria Univ Wellington, Dept Educ, Wellington, New Zealand
[3] Univ Texas Austin, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[4] Manhattanville Coll, Purchase, NY 10577 USA
关键词
autism spectrum disorder; comparison of displays; iPad (R); requesting; speech-generating device; COMMUNICATION; INDIVIDUALS; DISPLAY;
D O I
10.1080/10400435.2016.1143411
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Five children with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) were taught to request preferred items using four different augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) displays on an iPad (R)-based speech-generating device (SGD). Acquisition was compared using multi-element designs. Displays included a symbol-based grid, a photo image with embedded hotspots, a hybrid (photo image with embedded hotspots and symbols), and a pop-up symbol grid. Three participants mastered requesting items from a field of four with at least three displays, and one mastered requesting items in a field of two. The fifth participant did not acquire requests in a field of preferred items. Individualized display effects were present, and the photo image appeared to have provided the most consistent advantages for three participants. Some errors were more or less common with specific displays and/or participants. The results have important implications for AAC assessment and implementation protocols.
引用
收藏
页码:153 / 160
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Use of iPad/iPods with Individuals with Autism and other Developmental Disabilities: A Meta-analysis of Communication Interventions [J].
Alzrayer N. ;
Banda D.R. ;
Koul R.K. .
Review Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 2014, 1 (3) :179-191
[2]  
[Anonymous], INT SOC AUGM ALT COM
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, CHILDHOOD AUTISM RAT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, VINELAND ADAPTIVE BE
[5]   Evaluation of a multiple-stimulus presentation format for assessing reinforcer preferences [J].
DeLeon, IG ;
Iwata, BA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 1996, 29 (04) :519-533
[6]   Learning of dynamic display AAC technologies by typically developing 3-year-olds: Effect of different layouts and menu approaches [J].
Drager, KDR ;
Light, JC ;
Carlson, R ;
D'Silva, K ;
Larsson, B ;
Pitkin, L ;
Stopper, G .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2004, 47 (05) :1133-1148
[7]  
Frost L., 2002, PICTURE EXCHANGE COM, V2nd
[8]   Comparing Acquisition of AAC-Based Mands in Three Young Children with Autism Spectrum Disorder Using iPadA® Applications with Different Display and Design Elements [J].
Gevarter, Cindy ;
O'Reilly, Mark F. ;
Rojeski, Laura ;
Sammarco, Nicolette ;
Sigafoos, Jeff ;
Lancioni, Giulio E. ;
Lang, Russell .
JOURNAL OF AUTISM AND DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDERS, 2014, 44 (10) :2464-2474
[9]   THE INFLUENCE OF MATCHING AND MOTOR-IMITATION ABILITIES ON RAPID ACQUISITION OF MANUAL SIGNS AND EXCHANGE-BASED COMMUNICATIVE RESPONSES [J].
Gregory, Meagan K. ;
DeLeon, Iser G. ;
Richman, David M. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIOR ANALYSIS, 2009, 42 (02) :399-404
[10]   Comparison of the predictive validity and consistency among preference assessment procedures: A review of the literature [J].
Kang, Soyeon ;
O'Reilly, Mark ;
Lancioni, Giulio ;
Falcomata, Terry S. ;
Sigafoos, Jeff ;
Xu, Ziwei .
RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES, 2013, 34 (04) :1125-1133