What Makes a Tweet Fly? Analysis of Twitter Messaging at Four Infection Control Conferences

被引:17
作者
Mitchell, Brett G. [1 ,2 ]
Russo, Philip L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Otter, Jonathan A. [4 ]
Kiernan, Martin A. [5 ]
Aveling, Landon [1 ]
机构
[1] Avondale Coll Higher Educ, Fac Arts Nursing & Theol, Wahroonga, NSW, Australia
[2] Griffith Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Nathan, Qld, Australia
[3] Deakin Univ, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Burwood, Vic, Australia
[4] Imperial Coll London, Publ Hlth England, NIHR, HPRU,Healthcare Associated Infect & Antimicrobial, London, England
[5] Univ West London, Coll Nursing Midwifery & Healthcare, Richard Wells Res Ctr, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1017/ice.2017.170
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE To examine tweeting activity, networks, and common topics mentioned on Twitter at 4 international infection control and infectious disease conferences. DESIGN A cross-sectional study. METHODS An independent company was commissioned to undertake a Twitter trawl' each month between July 1, 2016, and November 31, 2016. The trawl identified any tweets that contained the official hashtags of the conferences for (1) the UK Infection Prevention Society, (2) IDWeek 2016, (3) the Federation of Infectious Society/Hospital Infection Society, and (4) the Australasian College for Infection Prevention and Control. Topics from each tweet were identified, and an examination of the frequency and timing of tweets was performed. A social network analysis was performed to illustrate connections between users. A multivariate binary logistic regression model was developed to explore the predictors of retweets.' RESULTS In total, 23,718 tweets were identified as using 1 of the 2 hashtags of interest. The results demonstrated that the most tweets were posted during the conferences. Network analysis demonstrated a diversity of twitter networks. A link to a web address was a significant predictor of whether a tweet would be retweeted (odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9-2.1). Other significant factors predicting a retweet included tweeting on topics such as Clostridium difficile (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.7-2.4) and the media (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.6-2.0). Tweets that contained a picture were significantly less likely to be retweeted (OR, 0.06; 95% CI, 0.05-0.08). CONCLUSION Twitter is a useful tool for information sharing and networking at infection control conferences. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:1271-1276
引用
收藏
页码:1271 / 1276
页数:6
相关论文
共 11 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2010, ANAL SOCIAL MEDIA NE
  • [2] Borgatti S.P., 2018, Analyzing social networks
  • [3] Twitter in urology and other surgical specialties at global conferences
    Chung, Amanda
    Woo, Henry
    [J]. ANZ JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 86 (04) : 224 - 227
  • [4] Use of Twitter to document the 2013 Academic Surgical Congress
    Cochran, Amalia
    Kao, Lillian S.
    Gusani, Niraj J.
    Suliburk, James W.
    Nwomeh, Benedict C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 2014, 190 (01) : 36 - 40
  • [5] Review of Twitter for Infectious Diseases Clinicians: Useful or a Waste of Time?
    Goff, Debra A.
    Kullar, Ravina
    Newland, Jason G.
    [J]. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 60 (10) : 1533 - 1540
  • [6] Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media
    Kaplan, Andreas M.
    Haenlein, Michael
    [J]. BUSINESS HORIZONS, 2010, 53 (01) : 59 - 68
  • [7] Kiernan M., 2011, J INFECT PREV, V12, P224, DOI [10.1177/1757177411429902, DOI 10.1177/1757177411429902]
  • [8] Liu S., 2014, Introducing intercultural communication: global cultures and contexts
  • [9] Mishori R, 2014, FAM MED, V46, P608
  • [10] A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication
    Moorhead, S. Anne
    Hazlett, Diane E.
    Harrison, Laura
    Carroll, Jennifer K.
    Irwin, Anthea
    Hoving, Ciska
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH, 2013, 15 (04)